qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 01/21] block: Fixes nfs compiling error on msys2/mingw


From: Yonggang Luo
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/21] block: Fixes nfs compiling error on msys2/mingw
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:14:31 +0800



On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:01 PM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:


> Am 09.09.2020 um 11:45 schrieb Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang@gmail.com>:
>
> These compiling errors are fixed:
> ../block/nfs.c:27:10: fatal error: poll.h: No such file or directory
>   27 | #include <poll.h>
>      |          ^~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
>
> ../block/nfs.c:63:5: error: unknown type name 'blkcnt_t'
>   63 |     blkcnt_t st_blocks;
>      |     ^~~~~~~~
> ../block/nfs.c: In function 'nfs_client_open':
> ../block/nfs.c:550:27: error: 'struct _stat64' has no member named 'st_blocks'
>  550 |     client->st_blocks = st.st_blocks;
>      |                           ^
> ../block/nfs.c: In function 'nfs_get_allocated_file_size':
> ../block/nfs.c:751:41: error: 'struct _stat64' has no member named 'st_blocks'
>  751 |     return (task.ret < 0 ? task.ret : st.st_blocks * 512);
>      |                                         ^
> ../block/nfs.c: In function 'nfs_reopen_prepare':
> ../block/nfs.c:805:31: error: 'struct _stat64' has no member named 'st_blocks'
>  805 |         client->st_blocks = st.st_blocks;
>      |                               ^
> ../block/nfs.c: In function 'nfs_get_allocated_file_size':
> ../block/nfs.c:752:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
>  752 | }
>      | ^
>
> On msys2/mingw, there is no st_blocks in struct _stat64, so we use consistence st_size instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang@gmail.com>
> ---
> block/nfs.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/nfs.c b/block/nfs.c
> index 61a249a9fc..34b2cd5708 100644
> --- a/block/nfs.c
> +++ b/block/nfs.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,9 @@
>
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>
> +#if !defined(_WIN32)
> #include <poll.h>
> +#endif
> #include "qemu/config-file.h"
> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> #include "qapi/error.h"
> @@ -51,6 +53,12 @@
> #define QEMU_NFS_MAX_PAGECACHE_SIZE (8388608 / NFS_BLKSIZE)
> #define QEMU_NFS_MAX_DEBUG_LEVEL 2
>
> +#if defined (_WIN32)
> +#define nfs_stat __stat64
> +#else
> +#define nfs_stat stat
> +#endif
> +
> typedef struct NFSClient {
>     struct nfs_context *context;
>     struct nfsfh *fh;
> @@ -58,7 +66,7 @@ typedef struct NFSClient {
>     bool has_zero_init;
>     AioContext *aio_context;
>     QemuMutex mutex;
> -    blkcnt_t st_blocks;
> +    int64_t st_size;
>     bool cache_used;
>     NFSServer *server;
>     char *path;
> @@ -70,7 +78,7 @@ typedef struct NFSRPC {
>     int ret;
>     int complete;
>     QEMUIOVector *iov;
> -    struct stat *st;
> +    struct nfs_stat *st;
>     Coroutine *co;
>     NFSClient *client;
> } NFSRPC;
> @@ -419,7 +427,7 @@ static int64_t nfs_client_open(NFSClient *client, BlockdevOptionsNfs *opts,
>                                int flags, int open_flags, Error **errp)
> {
>     int64_t ret = -EINVAL;
> -    struct stat st;
> +    struct nfs_stat st;
>     char *file = NULL, *strp = NULL;
>
>     qemu_mutex_init(&client->mutex);
> @@ -545,7 +553,7 @@ static int64_t nfs_client_open(NFSClient *client, BlockdevOptionsNfs *opts,
>     }
>
>     ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(st.st_size, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> -    client->st_blocks = st.st_blocks;
> +    client->st_size = st.st_size;
>     client->has_zero_init = S_ISREG(st.st_mode);
>     *strp = '/';
>     goto out;
> @@ -729,11 +737,11 @@ static int64_t nfs_get_allocated_file_size(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
>     NFSClient *client = bs->opaque;
>     NFSRPC task = {0};
> -    struct stat st;
> +    struct nfs_stat st;
>
>     if (bdrv_is_read_only(bs) &&
>         !(bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_NOCACHE)) {
> -        return client->st_blocks * 512;
> +        return client->st_size;
I am using   client->st_size instead client->st_blocks * 512, anything wrong with this?
>     }
>
>     task.bs = bs;
> @@ -746,7 +754,7 @@ static int64_t nfs_get_allocated_file_size(BlockDriverState *bs)
>     nfs_set_events(client);
>     BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, !task.complete);
>
> -    return (task.ret < 0 ? task.ret : st.st_blocks * 512);
> +    return (task.ret < 0 ? task.ret : st.st_size);
> }
>
> static int coroutine_fn
> @@ -778,7 +786,7 @@ static int nfs_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
>                               BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> {
>     NFSClient *client = state->bs->opaque;
> -    struct stat st;
> +    struct nfs_stat st;
>     int ret = 0;
>
>     if (state->flags & BDRV_O_RDWR && bdrv_is_read_only(state->bs)) {
> @@ -800,7 +808,7 @@ static int nfs_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
>                        nfs_get_error(client->context));
>             return ret;
>         }
> -        client->st_blocks = st.st_blocks;
> +        client->st_size = st.st_size;
>     }
>
>     return 0;
> --
> 2.28.0.windows.1
>


NACK. st_blocks and st_size is not the same. st_blocks is the number of allocated blocks on disk. st_size is the virtual size of a file as it may contain holes.
I think the appropriate fix is to not implement nfs_get_allocated_file_size on WIN32. Its not mandatory.

Please look at the   st_size, it's equivalant to  st_blocks * 512;

Peter




--
         此致

罗勇刚
Yours
    sincerely,
Yonggang Luo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]