[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] misc: Some inclusive terminology changes

From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] misc: Some inclusive terminology changes
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:38:31 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

Le 10/09/2020 à 09:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> We don't have (yet?) inclusive terminology guidelines,
> but the PCI hole memory is not "black", the DMA sources
> don't stream to "slaves", and there isn't really a TSX
> "black" list, we only check for broken fields.
> As this terms can be considered offensive, and changing
> them is a no-brain operation, simply do it.

These changes are technically trivial but they are not from an ethical
point of view. I will add to the trivial branch only if they are acked
by their own maintainers.

Moreover, I think we should have a project level guideline before doing
that to be sure everyone agrees.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]