[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: riscv32 wait() problem, qemu or glibc?
From: |
Andreas K . Hüttel |
Subject: |
Re: riscv32 wait() problem, qemu or glibc? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:09:10 +0300 |
> My guess is that somewhere in QEMU the types don't match what RV32 is
> using. It's probably worth printing out the size, alignment and value
> of everything at every stage and see what breaks.
Thanks.
> AFAIK RV32 linux-user mode is pretty much un-tested. So their might be
> all sorts of issues with it unfortunately.
Would you consider qemu system mode more reliable?
I need to prepare some bootable riscv gentoo images eventually anyway. Might
as well try a riscv32 one for comparison then if that is more promising.
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.