qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] meson: Allow optional target/${ARCH}/Kconfig


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] meson: Allow optional target/${ARCH}/Kconfig
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:17:06 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

On 30/09/20 14:50, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 9/30/20 12:43 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Extend the generic Meson script to pass optional target Kconfig
>> file to the minikconf script.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> We could use fs.exists() but is_file() is more specific
>> (can not be a directory).
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  meson.build | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
>> index d36dd085b5..9ab5d514d7 100644
>> --- a/meson.build
>> +++ b/meson.build
>> @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ kconfig_external_symbols = [
>>  ]
>>  ignored = ['TARGET_XML_FILES', 'TARGET_ABI_DIR', 'TARGET_DIRS']
>>  
>> +fs = import('fs')
>>  foreach target : target_dirs
>>    config_target = keyval.load(meson.current_build_dir() / target / 
>> 'config-target.mak')
>>  
>> @@ -569,8 +570,13 @@ foreach target : target_dirs
>>      endforeach
>>  
>>      config_devices_mak = target + '-config-devices.mak'
>> +    target_kconfig = 'target' / config_target['TARGET_BASE_ARCH'] / 
>> 'Kconfig'
>> +    minikconf_input = ['default-configs' / target + '.mak', 'Kconfig']
>> +    if fs.is_file(target_kconfig)
>> +      minikconf_input += [target_kconfig]
>> +    endif
>>      config_devices_mak = configure_file(
>> -      input: ['default-configs' / target + '.mak', 'Kconfig'],
>> +      input: minikconf_input,
>>        output: config_devices_mak,
>>        depfile: config_devices_mak + '.d',
>>        capture: true,
>>
> 
> I can't say I understand it, but the general idea seems right to me.

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]