qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] vhost: Ignore vrings in dirty log when using a vIOMMU


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Ignore vrings in dirty log when using a vIOMMU
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:18:03 -0400

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:37:18AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:23:43 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:29:43PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > When a vIOMMU is present, any address comming from the guest is an IO
> > > virtual address, including those of the vrings. The backend's accesses
> > > to the vrings happen through vIOMMU translation : the backend hence
> > > only logs the final guest physical address, not the IO virtual one.
> > > It thus doesn't make sense to make room for the vring addresses in the
> > > dirty log in this case.
> > > 
> > > This fixes a crash of the source when migrating a guest using in-kernel
> > > vhost-net and iommu_platform=on on POWER, because DMA regions are put
> > > at very high addresses and the resulting log size is likely to cause
> > > g_malloc0() to abort.
> > > 
> > > BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879349
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > 
> > I'm a little confused as to what's going on here.  Obviously
> > allocating dirty bitmaps in IOVA space doesn't make much sense.
> > But.. in all cases isn't the ring ending up in guest memory, whether
> > translated or not.  So why do specific addresses of the ring make a
> > difference in *any* case.
> > 
> 
> I admit I'm a bit surprised as well... I can't think of a scenario
> where the address of the used ring would be higher than the guest
> memory... Maybe MST can shed some light here ?

So the original idea was that vring itself is specified in
terms of HVA as opposed to rest of stuff which is specified
in terms of GPA.
This way we wanted to support e.g. migration by vhost writing into
qemu address space, qemu copying data to guest memory.




> > > ---
> > >  hw/virtio/vhost.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > index 1a1384e7a642..0b83d6b8e65e 100644
> > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > @@ -106,6 +106,20 @@ static void vhost_dev_sync_region(struct vhost_dev 
> > > *dev,
> > >      }
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +    VirtIODevice *vdev = dev->vdev;
> > > +
> > > +    /*
> > > +     * For vhost, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM means the backend support
> > > +     * incremental memory mapping API via IOTLB API. For platform that
> > > +     * does not have IOMMU, there's no need to enable this feature
> > > +     * which may cause unnecessary IOTLB miss/update trnasactions.
> > > +     */
> > > +    return vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory &&
> > > +           virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int vhost_sync_dirty_bitmap(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > >                                     MemoryRegionSection *section,
> > >                                     hwaddr first,
> > > @@ -130,6 +144,11 @@ static int vhost_sync_dirty_bitmap(struct vhost_dev 
> > > *dev,
> > >                                range_get_last(reg->guest_phys_addr,
> > >                                               reg->memory_size));
> > >      }
> > > +
> > > +    if (vhost_dev_has_iommu(dev)) {
> > > +        return 0;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > >      for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > >          struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->vqs + i;
> > >  
> > > @@ -172,6 +191,11 @@ static uint64_t vhost_get_log_size(struct vhost_dev 
> > > *dev)
> > >                                         reg->memory_size);
> > >          log_size = MAX(log_size, last / VHOST_LOG_CHUNK + 1);
> > >      }
> > > +
> > > +    if (vhost_dev_has_iommu(dev)) {
> > > +        return log_size;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > >      for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > >          struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->vqs + i;
> > >  
> > > @@ -287,20 +311,6 @@ static inline void vhost_dev_log_resize(struct 
> > > vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t size)
> > >      dev->log_size = size;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > -{
> > > -    VirtIODevice *vdev = dev->vdev;
> > > -
> > > -    /*
> > > -     * For vhost, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM means the backend support
> > > -     * incremental memory mapping API via IOTLB API. For platform that
> > > -     * does not have IOMMU, there's no need to enable this feature
> > > -     * which may cause unnecessary IOTLB miss/update trnasactions.
> > > -     */
> > > -    return vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory &&
> > > -           virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static void *vhost_memory_map(struct vhost_dev *dev, hwaddr addr,
> > >                                hwaddr *plen, bool is_write)
> > >  {
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]