qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: does make check now require TCG? Or is it a parallelism issue?


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: does make check now require TCG? Or is it a parallelism issue?
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:25:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1

On 10/9/20 9:21 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/10/2020 20.24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:


Il gio 8 ott 2020, 20:05 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org
<mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>> ha scritto:

     Ah, TARGET_DIRS isn't being pruned anymore when a target is disabled for
     lack
     of accelerator.

     Paolo, side effect of 8a19980e3f ("configure: move accelerator logic to
     meson")?  I guess we should move the setting of TARGET_DIRS to meson as
     well.


TARGET_DIRS is pruned by Meson, I didn't add any back propagation to make
because it is not really needed; qemu-iotests only every uses the "host
architecture" QEMU binary (see tests/qemu-iotests/common.config),
check-block + --target-list has never worked.

I haven't tried since the meson conversion, but at least a couple of months
ago, it was perfectly fine to run configure with
--target-list=tricore-softmmu and then to run "make check-block" afterwards.

That qemu_arch setting from tests/qemu-iotests/common.config is just used
for the preferred binary, but if it is not available,
tests/qemu-iotests/check falls back to any other qemu-system-xxx binary that
it can find.

I wonder if this is why the migration acceptance tests aren't run
anymore.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]