Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] replay: do not build if TCG is not available

[Claudio Fontana]

On 10/13/20 7:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 13/10/20 19:17, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>> This is definitely better, but I'll defer to Kevin with respect to the
>>> naming of the function; having a bdrv_* function that has nothing to do
>>> with the block layer is still smelly of a sub-optimal API, and I'm not
>>> sure why the API change belongs in the series.
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> I am not attached to the specific name, if someone has a better naming / 
>> proposes a better prefix I will replace of course.
> 
> Can you just unbreak TCG in this series, and we can then revisit the
> topic of functional code in stubs later?
> 
> Paolo
> 
> 

Hi Paolo, probably just a typo there, it's non-tcg (--disable-tcg) that's 
broken, not TCG.

If nothing else would be acceptable and we are in a hurry, sure lets close the 
nose and do it,
it's just a tiny bit of some duplicated code in stubs.

I'd prefer if we have something a bit better that's all, but if this is hurting 
badly lets do it!

Ciao,

Claudio