Re: [PATCH v1] migration: using trace_ to replace DPRINTF

[Bihong Yu]

Thank you for your review.OK ,I will adapt them.

On 2020/10/17 17:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/17/20 11:35 AM, Bihong Yu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Bihong Yu <yubihong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   migration/block.c      | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>   migration/page_cache.c | 13 +++----------
>>   migration/trace-events | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> ...
>> diff --git a/migration/trace-events b/migration/trace-events
>> index 338f38b..772bb81 100644
>> --- a/migration/trace-events
>> +++ b/migration/trace-events
>> @@ -325,3 +325,16 @@ get_ramblock_vfn_hash(const char *idstr, uint64_t vfn, 
>> uint32_t crc) "ramblock n
>>   calc_page_dirty_rate(const char *idstr, uint32_t new_crc, uint32_t 
>> old_crc) "ramblock name: %s, new crc: %" PRIu32 ", old crc: %" PRIu32
>>   skip_sample_ramblock(const char *idstr, uint64_t ramblock_size) "ramblock 
>> name: %s, ramblock size: %" PRIu64
>>   find_page_matched(const char *idstr) "ramblock %s addr or size changed"
>> +
>> +# block.c
>> +init_blk_migration_shared(const char *blk_device_name) "Start migration for 
>> %s with shared base image"
>> +init_blk_migration_full(const char *blk_device_name) "Start full migration 
>> for %s"
>> +mig_save_device_dirty(int64_t sector) "Error reading sector %" PRId64
>> +flush_blks(const char *action, int submitted, int read_done, int 
>> transferred) "%s submitted %d read_done %d transferred %d"
>> +block_save(const char *mig_stage, int submitted, int transferred) "Enter 
>> save live %s submitted %d transferred %d"
>> +block_save_complete(void) "Block migration completed"
>> +block_save_pending(uint64_t pending) "Enter save live pending  %" PRIu64
>> +
>> +# page_cache.c
>> +cache_init(int64_t max_num_items) "Setting cache buckets to %" PRId64
>> +cache_insert(void) "Error allocating page"
> 
> The patch is good, but I strongly recommend to have trace events
> starting with the subsystem prefix (here migration). So we can
> keep using the 'block*' rule to match all events from the block
> subsystem, without including the migration events.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil.
> 
> .