[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] intel_iommu: Fix two misuse of "0x%u" prints
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
[PATCH] intel_iommu: Fix two misuse of "0x%u" prints |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:39:22 -0400 |
Dave magically found this. Fix them with "0x%x".
Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 749eb6ad63..70ac837733 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -2665,7 +2665,7 @@ static uint64_t vtd_mem_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
unsigned size)
if (addr + size > DMAR_REG_SIZE) {
error_report_once("%s: MMIO over range: addr=0x%" PRIx64
- " size=0x%u", __func__, addr, size);
+ " size=0x%x", __func__, addr, size);
return (uint64_t)-1;
}
@@ -2716,7 +2716,7 @@ static void vtd_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
if (addr + size > DMAR_REG_SIZE) {
error_report_once("%s: MMIO over range: addr=0x%" PRIx64
- " size=0x%u", __func__, addr, size);
+ " size=0x%x", __func__, addr, size);
return;
}
--
2.26.2
- [PATCH] intel_iommu: Fix two misuse of "0x%u" prints,
Peter Xu <=