qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug 1900918] Re: PXB devices


From: bwidawsk
Subject: [Bug 1900918] Re: PXB devices
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:39:44 -0000

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1900919 ***
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900919

I accidentally double submitted this, and this one has the wrong description. 
Please close and use
#1900919 instead.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1900919
   PXB selected as root bus incorrectly

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900918

Title:
  PXB devices

Status in QEMU:
  New

Bug description:
  release: 4c41341af76cfc85b5a6c0f87de4838672ab9f89

  qdev_device_add() will search for the "closest" bus possible, and bail out 
early if that bus is a root bus. pxb devices are considered root buses and so 
if you either
  1. Add a PCI device on the QEMU command line *after* a pxb device, or
  2. Add an integrated PCI device (like a watchdog)

  #1: -device pxb-pcie,id=cxl.0,bus=pcie.0,bus_nr=52 -device 
ahci,id=sata0,addr=0x8
  #2: -watchdog i6300esb -device pxb-pcie,id=cxl.0,bus=pcie.0,bus_nr=52

  The PXB will get selected as the bus (instead of the real root bus)
  and this will cause an assertion failure with the message like "qemu-
  system-x86_64: -device ahci,id=sata0,addr=0x8: PCI: Only PCI/PCIe
  bridges can be plugged into pxb-pcie"

  I think this is relatively solvable in the code base by determining if
  a bus is an expander, and skipping it if so. However, I wonder if it
  makes more sense to just allow expanders to have endpoint devices.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1900918/+subscriptions



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]