qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 00/13] 9p queue 2020-10-23


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [PULL 00/13] 9p queue 2020-10-23
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 22:25:37 +0100

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:48:37 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:

> On Montag, 26. Oktober 2020 11:33:42 CET Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 12:46, Christian Schoenebeck
> > 
> > <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit 
> > > 4c5b97bfd0dd54dc27717ae8d1cd10e14eef1430:
> > >   Merge remote-tracking branch
> > >   'remotes/kraxel/tags/modules-20201022-pull-request' into staging
> > >   (2020-10-22 12:33:21 +0100)> 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >   https://github.com/cschoenebeck/qemu.git tags/pull-9p-20201023
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to ee01926a11b1f9bffcd6cdec0961dd9d1882da71:
> > >   tests/9pfs: add local Tunlinkat hard link test (2020-10-22 20:26:33
> > >   +0200)
> > > 
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 9pfs: more tests using local fs driver
> > > 
> > > Only 9pfs test case changes this time:
> > > 
> > > * Refactor: Rename functions to make top-level test functions fs_*()
> > > 
> > >   easily distinguishable from utility test functions do_*().
> > > 
> > > * Refactor: Drop unnecessary function arguments in utility test
> > > 
> > >   functions.
> > > 
> > > * More test cases using the 9pfs 'local' filesystem driver backend,
> > > 
> > >   namely for the following 9p requests: Tunlinkat, Tlcreate, Tsymlink
> > >   and Tlink.
> > > 
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I get a 'make check' failure on x86-64 Linux host:
> > 
> > PASS 54 qtest-x86_64: qos-test
> > /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-
> > 9p-tests/local/config PASS 55 qtest-x86_64: qos-test
> > /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-
> > 9p-tests/local/create_dir PASS 56 qtest-x86_64: qos-test
> > /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-
> > 9p-tests/local/unlinkat_dir PASS 57 qtest-x86_64: qos-test
> > /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-
> > 9p-tests/local/create_file PASS 58 qtest-x86_64: qos-test
> > /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-
> > 9p-tests/local/unlinkat_file PASS 59 qtest-x86_64: qos-test
> > /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-
> > 9p-tests/local/symlink_file Received response 7 (RLERROR) instead of 73
> > (RMKDIR)
> > Rlerror has errno 2 (No such file or directory)
> > **
> > ERROR:../../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion
> > failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)

Not sure this is related to this PR actually. Dave Gilbert reported on irc that
he encountered a similar issue with 'make -j check', likely without these 
patches.

> > ERROR qtest-x86_64: qos-test - Bail out!
> > ERROR:../../tests/qtest/virtio-9ptest.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion
> > failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
> > Makefile.mtest:3953: recipe for target 'run-test-492' failed
> > 
> > 
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
> 
> So the 9p server is already failing to create the test case directory
> "./qtest-9p-local/05/" relative to your current working directory.
> 
> I would appreciate to get more info when you have some free cycles, as I'm
> unable to reproduce this on any system unfortunately. But no hurry as
> these tests only become relevant actually for QEMU 6.
> 
> What puzzles me is that the previous test cases succeeded there, which all
> create their own test directory in the same way:
> 
>       ./qtest-9p-local/01/
>       ./qtest-9p-local/02/  (<-- dir vanishes after that test completed)
>       ./qtest-9p-local/03/
>       ./qtest-9p-local/04/
>       ...
> 
> How does the "./qtest-9p-local/" directory look like after that
> "local/symlink_file" test failed there? You can use this shortcut:
> 
> export QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> cd build
> tests/qtest/qos-test --verbose
> ls -l qtest-9p-local
> 
> That latter qos-test run will also output the assembled qemu command
> line the 9p local tests would run with, which might also be helpful,
> e.g. the relevant output would be something like this:
> 
> GTest: run: 
> /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-tests/local/config
> (MSG: starting QEMU: exec x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -qtest 
> unix:/tmp/qtest-7428.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev 
> socket,path=/tmp/qtest-7428.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control 
> -display none -M pc  -fsdev 
> local,id=fsdev0,path='/home/me/git/qemu/build/qtest-9p-local',security_model=mapped-xattr
>  -device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=fsdev0,addr=04.0,mount_tag=qtest -accel qtest)
> 
> Would probably the test succeed if run alone?
> 
> tests/qtest/qos-test -p 
> /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-tests/local/symlink_file
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]