[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 00/30] nvme emulation patches for 5.2
From: |
Klaus Jensen |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 00/30] nvme emulation patches for 5.2 |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:14:14 +0100 |
On Oct 29 13:20, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/29/20 12:52 PM, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Oct 29 11:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 10:49, Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Peter,
> >>>
> >>> The following changes since commit
> >>> 1dc887329a10903940501b43e8c0cc67af7c06d5:
> >>>
> >>> Merge remote-tracking branch
> >>> 'remotes/philmd-gitlab/tags/sd-next-20201026' into staging (2020-10-26
> >>> 17:19:26 +0000)
> >>>
> >>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>
> >>> git://git.infradead.org/qemu-nvme.git tags/nvme-next-pull-request
> >>>
> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 843c8f91a7ad63f8f3e4e564d3f41f3d030ab8a9:
> >>>
> >>> hw/block/nvme: fix queue identifer validation (2020-10-27 11:29:25
> >>> +0100)
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> nvme emulation patches for 5.2
> >>>
> >>> - lots of cleanups
> >>> - add support for scatter/gather lists
> >>> - add support for multiple namespaces (adds new nvme-ns device)
> >>> - change default pci vendor/device id
> >>> - add support for per-namespace smart log
> >>
> >> Hi. This tag appears to have been signed with a GPG key
> >> which isn't one that's been used before for an nvme pullreq
> >> and which isn't on the public GPG servers...
> >>
> >
> > Uhm. Keith, can we coordinate a keysigning?
> >
> > Would a signature by Keith on my key be acceptable to you Peter? That
> > way Keith doesn't have to create a new tag and bomb the list again.
>
> Although list bombing isn't really a problem, if you don't modify
> the patches, then you can simply post the cover (as v2) without
> the patches.
>
> You can also get your key signed and ask Peter to retry your tag,
> or push a different tag and ask again, replying to this cover.
>
Thanks Phil!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PULL 24/30] hw/block/nvme: reject io commands if only admin command set selected, (continued)
- [PULL 24/30] hw/block/nvme: reject io commands if only admin command set selected, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- [PULL 28/30] hw/block/nvme: fix prp mapping status codes, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- [PULL 29/30] hw/block/nvme: fix create IO SQ/CQ status codes, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- [PULL 27/30] hw/block/nvme: report actual LBA data shift in LBAF, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- [PULL 22/30] hw/block/nvme: validate command set selected, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- [PULL 25/30] hw/block/nvme: add nsid to get/setfeat trace events, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- [PULL 30/30] hw/block/nvme: fix queue identifer validation, Klaus Jensen, 2020/10/27
- Re: [PULL 00/30] nvme emulation patches for 5.2, Peter Maydell, 2020/10/29