[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] fw_cfg: Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg
From: |
Jiahui Cen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] fw_cfg: Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:07:39 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
Hi Phil,
On 2020/11/5 5:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> On 11/4/20 9:05 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> +Phil, +Gerd
>>
>> On 11/04/20 20:54, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> +Marcel
>>>
>>> On 11/03/20 13:01, Jiahui Cen wrote:
>>>> From: Yubo Miao <miaoyubo@huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg, therefore the uefi could
>>>> get the extra roots. Only if the uefi knows there are extra roots,
>>>> the config space of devices behind the root could be obtained.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yubo Miao <miaoyubo@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> hw/arm/virt.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>> hw/i386/pc.c | 18 ++----------------
>>>> hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h | 2 ++
>>>> include/hw/pci/pcie_host.h | 4 ++++
>>>> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> I realize I never reacted to this patch before (and we're at v9), so you
>> might not welcome my feedback at this point.
>>
>> The explanation why I've only reacted now is the following: there's an
>> agreement between Phil and myself that Phil handles fw_cfg reviews
>> primarily, and I review only (or almost only) Phil's patches for fw_cfg.
>> Furthermore, all versions of this particular patch, as far as I can see,
>> CC'd me but not Phil. So Phil never knew to look, and I never checked
>> (this being an fw_cfg patch, per subject line) beyond the author being
>> Phil or not.
>
> I noticed this patch yesterday too (by luck looking at the cover).
> Since we are in freeze, I tagged it for review but postponed it for
> in 2 or 3 weeks. Sorry for not mentioning that I would review this
> later on the list.
Sorry for forgetting to CC you. I'm glad to wait for your review :)
Thanks
Jiahui
>
>> The solution is of course to use the get_maintainer.pl script for
>> determining reviewers, and adding them with "Cc:" tags to the commit
>> message. (You also missed Marcel at the least; see my previous
>> response.) git-send-email is supposed to adhere to those "Cc:" tags.
>>
>> The reason I've looked now is... I guess I was too tired to remember our
>> agreement with Phil.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
>
> .
>
- [PATCH v9 0/8] pci_expander_brdige:acpi: Support pxb-pcie for ARM, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 5/8] acpi: Align the size to 128k, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 3/8] acpi: Extract crs build form acpi_build.c, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 8/8] unit-test: Add the binary file and clear diff.h, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 1/8] acpi: Extract two APIs from acpi_dsdt_add_pci, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 2/8] fw_cfg: Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
[PATCH v9 6/8] unit-test: The files changed., Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
[PATCH v9 4/8] acpi: Refactor the source of host bridge and build tables for pxb, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
[PATCH v9 7/8] unit-test: Add testcase for pxb, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] pci_expander_brdige:acpi: Support pxb-pcie for ARM, Gerd Hoffmann, 2020/11/05