qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 11/29] vl: extract various command line desugaring snippets t


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/29] vl: extract various command line desugaring snippets to a new function
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:04:53 +0100



Il mer 11 nov 2020, 20:57 Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:21:26 -0400
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  softmmu/vl.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> index c2a5ee61f9..6749109b29 100644
> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static const char *boot_once;
>  static const char *incoming;
>  static const char *loadvm;
>  enum vga_retrace_method vga_retrace_method = VGA_RETRACE_DUMB;

> +int mem_prealloc; /* force preallocation of physical target memory */
Is there a reason for it not being static?

I will check if I am using it later in the series, but I don't think so.


>  int display_opengl;
>  const char* keyboard_layout = NULL;
>  ram_addr_t ram_size;
> @@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ int fd_bootchk = 1;
>  static int no_reboot;
>  int no_shutdown = 0;
>  int graphic_rotate = 0;
> -const char *watchdog;
> +static const char *watchdog;
>  QEMUOptionRom option_rom[MAX_OPTION_ROMS];
>  int nb_option_roms;
>  int old_param = 0;
> @@ -2910,6 +2911,25 @@ static void qemu_validate_options(void)
>  #endif
>  }

> +static void qemu_process_sugar_options(void)
> +{
> +    if (mem_prealloc) {
> +        char *val;
> +
> +        val = g_strdup_printf("%d",
> +                 (uint32_t) qemu_opt_get_number(qemu_find_opts_singleton("smp-opts"), "cpus", 1));
if -smp isn't present it value used here was mc->default_cpus,
which in most cases is 1 modulo some ARM boards and riscv.

Yes, I remember noticing that but decided I would not care. I should have added it to the commit message, though.

Paolo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]