qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v3 39/53] qdev: Get rid of ArrayElementProperty struct


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: [PATCH v3 39/53] qdev: Get rid of ArrayElementProperty struct
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:43:36 -0500

Now that we don't store any additional data about the property in
AraryElementStruct, we don't need it anymore.  We can just
allocate a Property struct directly.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
Change v1 -> v2:
* Get rid of the struct, but not of the release function (we
  still need it, or we will leak the Property struct we allocate)
---
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
---
 hw/core/qdev-properties.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
index 9f60f3b44d..0ffef5ab4f 100644
--- a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
+++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
@@ -521,27 +521,17 @@ const PropertyInfo prop_info_size32 = {
 
 /* --- support for array properties --- */
 
-/* Used as an opaque for the object properties we add for each
- * array element. Note that the struct Property must be first
- * in the struct so that a pointer to this works as the opaque
- * for the underlying element's property hooks as well as for
- * our own release callback.
- */
-typedef struct {
-    struct Property prop;
-} ArrayElementProperty;
-
 /* object property release callback for array element properties:
  * we call the underlying element's property release hook, and
  * then free the memory we allocated when we added the property.
  */
 static void array_element_release(Object *obj, const char *name, void *opaque)
 {
-    ArrayElementProperty *p = opaque;
-    if (p->prop.info->release) {
-        p->prop.info->release(obj, name, opaque);
+    Property *prop = opaque;
+    if (prop->info->release) {
+        prop->info->release(obj, name, opaque);
     }
-    g_free(p);
+    g_free(prop);
 }
 
 static void set_prop_arraylen(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
@@ -585,20 +575,20 @@ static void set_prop_arraylen(Object *obj, Visitor *v, 
const char *name,
     *arrayptr = eltptr = g_malloc0(*alenptr * prop->arrayfieldsize);
     for (i = 0; i < *alenptr; i++, eltptr += prop->arrayfieldsize) {
         g_autofree char *propname = g_strdup_printf("%s[%d]", arrayname, i);
-        ArrayElementProperty *arrayprop = g_new0(ArrayElementProperty, 1);
+        Property *arrayprop = g_new0(Property, 1);
         ObjectProperty *elmop;
-        arrayprop->prop.info = prop->arrayinfo;
+        arrayprop->info = prop->arrayinfo;
         /* This ugly piece of pointer arithmetic sets up the offset so
          * that when the underlying get/set hooks call qdev_get_prop_ptr
          * they get the right answer despite the array element not actually
          * being inside the device struct.
          */
-        arrayprop->prop.offset = eltptr - (void *)obj;
-        assert(object_field_prop_ptr(obj, &arrayprop->prop) == eltptr);
+        arrayprop->offset = eltptr - (void *)obj;
+        assert(object_field_prop_ptr(obj, arrayprop) == eltptr);
         elmop = object_property_add(obj, propname,
-                                    arrayprop->prop.info->name,
-                                    field_prop_getter(arrayprop->prop.info),
-                                    field_prop_setter(arrayprop->prop.info),
+                                    arrayprop->info->name,
+                                    field_prop_getter(arrayprop->info),
+                                    field_prop_setter(arrayprop->info),
                                     array_element_release,
                                     arrayprop);
         elmop->allow_set = op->allow_set;
-- 
2.28.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]