qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:16:30 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 16.11.20 14:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi David,

Is this aiming at 5.2?

Hi,

Good point!

If possible, we want this in 5.2.

Thanks!


On 11/16/20 11:59 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
     -drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
     -device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \

VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
     01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
             NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983

Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
  stubs/ram-block.c   |  6 ++++++
  util/vfio-helpers.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/stubs/ram-block.c b/stubs/ram-block.c
index 73c0a3ee08..108197683b 100644
--- a/stubs/ram-block.c
+++ b/stubs/ram-block.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
  #include "exec/ramlist.h"
  #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
+#include "exec/memory.h"
void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb)
  {
@@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void 
*opaque)
  {
      return 0;
  }
+
+int ram_block_discard_disable(bool state)
+{
+    return 0;
+}
diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
index c469beb061..2bec48e163 100644
--- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
+++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
  #include "qapi/error.h"
  #include "exec/ramlist.h"
  #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
+#include "exec/memory.h"
  #include "trace.h"
  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
  #include "standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h"
@@ -494,8 +495,20 @@ QEMUVFIOState *qemu_vfio_open_pci(const char *device, 
Error **errp)
      int r;
      QEMUVFIOState *s = g_new0(QEMUVFIOState, 1);
+ /*
+     * VFIO may pin all memory inside mappings, resulting it in pinning
+     * all memory inside RAM blocks unconditionally.
+     */
+    r = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
+    if (r) {
+        error_setg_errno(errp, -r, "Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
+        g_free(s);
+        return NULL;
+    }
+
      r = qemu_vfio_init_pci(s, device, errp);
      if (r) {
+        ram_block_discard_disable(false);
          g_free(s);
          return NULL;
      }
@@ -837,4 +850,5 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
      close(s->device);
      close(s->group);
      close(s->container);
+    ram_block_discard_disable(false);
  }




--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]