Re: [RFC v6 10/11] accel: introduce AccelCPUClass extending CPUClass

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 27/11/20 12:41, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> This seems to be due to "-machine none", is machine none supposed to
> have no default cpu_type? Is it expected that for machine none
> current_machine->cpu_type is NULL, or is it a bug?

"-machine none" has no CPU at all, so I think anything is acceptable. 
There's also the possibility of emulating big.LITTLE machines in the 
future with >1 cpu_type, so the cop out of doing it on the whole 
hierarchy is easiest.

Paolo