[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why do we have both CONFIG_SOFTMMU and CONFIG_USER_ONLY?
From: |
Claudio Fontana |
Subject: |
Re: Why do we have both CONFIG_SOFTMMU and CONFIG_USER_ONLY? |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:27:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 |
On 12/7/20 12:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/12/20 12:19, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> As in Subject,
>>
>> am I understanding correctly that the one or the other is redundant?
>>
>> Should we keep only one of them?
>
> In the code it's not strictly necessary. However in both Makefiles and
> meson.build it made/makes things a bit clearer.
>
> Paolo
>
K.. thanks a lot, maybe we should document all of this stuff in docs/devel/...
Ciao,
Claudio