[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:06:41 +0000 |
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:49:48 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> On 21-01-06 13:28:05, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:52:56 -0800
> > Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This implements all device MMIO up to the first capability .That
> > > includes the CXL Device Capabilities Array Register, as well as all of
> > > the CXL Device Capability Header Registers. The latter are filled in as
> > > they are implemented in the following patches.
> > >
> > > v2: Break out register alignment checks (Jonathan)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > One buglet / inconsistency inline that I spotted whilst chasing that issue
> > with size of reads.
> >
> > Will get to a full review after messing around ('testing') this a bit more
> > ;)
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > hw/cxl/meson.build | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..d1b1371e66
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * CXL Utility library for devices
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright(C) 2020 Intel Corporation.
> > > + *
> > > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
> > > the
> > > + * COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > > +#include "qemu/log.h"
> > > +#include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> > > +
> > > +static int cxl_device_check_register_alignment(hwaddr offset, unsigned
> > > size)
> > > +{
> > > + if (unlikely(offset & (size - 1))) {
> > > + return 1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static uint64_t caps_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> > > +{
> > > + CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque;
> > > +
> > > + if (cxl_device_check_register_alignment(offset, size)) {
> > > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unaligned register read\n");
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return ldn_le_p(cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state + offset, size);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const MemoryRegionOps caps_ops = {
> > > + .read = caps_reg_read,
> > > + .write = NULL,
> > > + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> > > + .valid = {
> > > + .min_access_size = 4,
> > > + .max_access_size = 8,
> > > + },
> > > + .impl = {
> > > + .min_access_size = 4,
> > > + .max_access_size = 8,
> > > + },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState
> > > *cxl_dstate)
> > > +{
> > > + /* This will be a BAR, so needs to be rounded up to pow2 for PCI
> > > spec */
> > > + memory_region_init(
> > > + &cxl_dstate->device_registers, obj, "device-registers",
> > > + pow2ceil(CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH +
> > > CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET));
> >
> > I can see why you jumped directly to sizing this for the whole region, but
> > the snag
> > is that means I think you missed the fact that patch 8 adds a region after
> > the end
> > of the mailbox. Doesn't result in an actual bug because the ceil above
> > takes
> > you way past the space needed though (the memory device region is only 8
> > bytes long).
> >
> >
>
> Maybe I misunderstand, but this is the intended behavior.
> cxl_dstate->device_registers is the MemoryRegion container for all the
> subregions that are the actual device MMIO.
>
> +------------------+
> ^ | |
> | | unused |
> | --------------------
> | | memdev regs |
> | --------------------
> | | |
> | | +--------------+ |
> cxl_dstate-> | | | | |
> device_registers | | | | |
> | | |payload | |
> | | |(2k currently)| |
> | | | | |
> | | | | |
> | | +--------------+ |
> | | mailbox regs |
> | --------------------
> | | device regs |
> v --------------------
> | caps regs |
> BAR ------> +------------------+
>
>
> Perhaps I should add this as a comment in the code?
I agree with intent but above it is setting limit to the top of
the mailbox regs, not the memdev regs which I'd expect to see.
>
> > > +
> > > + memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->caps, obj, &caps_ops, cxl_dstate,
> > > + "cap-array", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET - 0);
> > > +
> > > + memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0,
> > > + &cxl_dstate->caps);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> > > +{
> > > + uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> > > + const int cap_count = 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> > > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> > > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_VERSION, 1);
> > > + ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, CAP_COUNT, cap_count);
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/meson.build b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> > > index 00c3876a0f..47154d6850 100644
> > > --- a/hw/cxl/meson.build
> > > +++ b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > > softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_CXL', if_true: files(
> > > 'cxl-component-utils.c',
> > > + 'cxl-device-utils.c',
> > > ))
> >
- [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] CXL 2.0 Support, Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
- [RFC PATCH v2 01/32] Temp: Add the PCI_EXT_ID_DVSEC definition to the qemu pci_regs.h copy., Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
- [RFC PATCH v2 02/32] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
- [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
- [RFC PATCH v2 04/32] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
- [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
[RFC PATCH v2 06/32] hw/cxl/device: Add device status (8.2.8.3), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
[RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Jonathan Cameron, 2021/01/06
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/06
- Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Jonathan Cameron, 2021/01/06
- Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/06
- Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/06
- Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/08
[RFC PATCH v2 09/32] hw/cxl/device: Add cheap EVENTS implementation (8.2.9.1), Ben Widawsky, 2021/01/05