This is the first patch,:
It's store MSR bits differntly for different rfi instructions:
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-ppc: fix RFI by clearing some bits of MSR
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-05/msg02999.htmlComes from target-ppc: fix RFI by clearing some bits of MSR
SHA-1: c3d420ead1aee9fcfd12be11cbdf6b1620134773
target-ppc/op_helper.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
```
diff --git a/target-ppc/op_helper.c b/target-ppc/op_helper.c
index 8f2ee986bb..3c3aa60bc3 100644
--- a/target-ppc/op_helper.c
+++ b/target-ppc/op_helper.c
@@ -1646,20 +1646,20 @@ static inline void do_rfi(target_ulong nip, target_ulong msr,
void helper_rfi (void)
{
do_rfi(env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0x0), 1);
+ ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 1);
}
#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
void helper_rfid (void)
{
do_rfi(env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0x0), 0);
+ ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
}
void helper_hrfid (void)
{
do_rfi(env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0x0), 0);
+ ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
}
#endif
#endif
```
This is the second patch,:
it's remove the parameter `target_ulong msrm, int keep_msrh`
Comes from ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation
SHA-1: a2e71b28e832346409efc795ecd1f0a2bcb705a3
```
target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
index 30e960e30b..aa0b63f4b0 100644
--- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
@@ -922,25 +922,20 @@ void helper_store_msr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong val)
}
}
-static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip, target_ulong msr,
- target_ulong msrm, int keep_msrh)
+static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip, target_ulong msr)
{
CPUState *cs = CPU(ppc_env_get_cpu(env));
+ /* MSR:POW cannot be set by any form of rfi */
+ msr &= ~(1ULL << MSR_POW);
+
#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
- if (msr_is_64bit(env, msr)) {
- nip = (uint64_t)nip;
- msr &= (uint64_t)msrm;
- } else {
+ /* Switching to 32-bit ? Crop the nip */
+ if (!msr_is_64bit(env, msr)) {
nip = (uint32_t)nip;
- msr = (uint32_t)(msr & msrm);
- if (keep_msrh) {
- msr |= env->msr & ~((uint64_t)0xFFFFFFFF);
- }
}
#else
nip = (uint32_t)nip;
- msr &= (uint32_t)msrm;
#endif
/* XXX: beware: this is false if VLE is supported */
env->nip = nip & ~((target_ulong)0x00000003);
@@ -959,26 +954,24 @@ static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip, target_ulong msr,
void helper_rfi(CPUPPCState *env)
{
- if (env->excp_model == POWERPC_EXCP_BOOKE) {
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
- } else {
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 1);
- }
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1] & 0xfffffffful);
}
+#define MSR_BOOK3S_MASK
#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
void helper_rfid(CPUPPCState *env)
{
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
+ /* The architeture defines a number of rules for which bits
+ * can change but in practice, we handle this in hreg_store_msr()
+ * which will be called by do_rfi(), so there is no need to filter
+ * here
+ */
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1]);
}
void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
{
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1]);
}
#endif
@@ -986,28 +979,24 @@ void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
/* Embedded PowerPC specific helpers */
void helper_40x_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
{
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR2], env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR3],
- ~((target_ulong)0xFFFF0000), 0);
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR2], env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR3]);
}
void helper_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
{
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1]);
}
void helper_rfdi(CPUPPCState *env)
{
/* FIXME: choose CSRR1 or DSRR1 based on cpu type */
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR1]);
}
void helper_rfmci(CPUPPCState *env)
{
/* FIXME: choose CSRR1 or MCSRR1 based on cpu type */
- do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR1],
- ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
+ do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR1]);
}
#endif
@@ -1045,7 +1034,7 @@ void helper_td(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong arg1, target_ulong arg2,
void helper_rfsvc(CPUPPCState *env)
{
- do_rfi(env, env->lr, env->ctr, 0x0000FFFF, 0);
+ do_rfi(env, env->lr, env->ctr & 0x0000FFFF);
}
/* Embedded.Processor Control */
```
And of cause, the second patch fixes some problem, but also cause new problem, how to implement these instruction properly?
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo