[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gitlab-ci: Add alpine to pipeline

From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gitlab-ci: Add alpine to pipeline
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:26:58 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:22:47AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18/01/2021 11.11, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > > We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many
> > > failures in checks due to minor string mismatch.
> > 
> > Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds
> > rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored.
> I haven't tried, but I guess it's the "check-block" iotests that are likely
> failing with a different libc, since they do string comparison on the
> textual output of the tests. If that's the case, it would maybe be still ok
> to run "check-qtest" and "check-union" on Alpine instead of the whole
> "check" test suite.

Perhaps errno strings are different due to libc hitting block tests. I
would expect this to be explained in the commit message though with
example, so we have a clear record of why we needed to disable this.

It might indicate a need to change our test suite to be more robust
in this area, because that would also suggest the tests might fail
on  non-Linux.

|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]