[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thr
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:11:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) |
* Andrey Gruzdev (andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com) wrote:
> On 21.01.2021 12:56, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Andrey Gruzdev (andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com) wrote:
> > > On 19.01.2021 21:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > * Andrey Gruzdev (andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com) wrote:
> > > > > Introducing implementation of 'background' snapshot thread
> > > > > which in overall follows the logic of precopy migration
> > > > > while internally utilizes completely different mechanism
> > > > > to 'freeze' vmstate at the start of snapshot creation.
> > > > >
> > > > > This mechanism is based on userfault_fd with wr-protection
> > > > > support and is Linux-specific.
> > > > I noticed there weren't any bdrv_ calls in here; I guess with a snapshot
> > > > you still have the source running so still have it accessing the disk;
> > > > do you do anything to try and wire the ram snapshotting up to disk
> > > > snapshotting?
> > > Block-related manipulations should be done externally, I think.
> > > So create backing images for RW nodes, then stop VM, switch block graph
> > > and start background snapshot. Something like create 'virsh
> > > snapshot-create-as'
> > > does, but in other sequence.
> > If you get a chance it would be great if you could put together an
> > example of doing the combination RAM+block; that way we find out if there's
> > anything silly missing.
> >
> > Dave
>
> Yep, I'll take a look at the QMP command sequences, how it should look
> like in our case and prepare an example, hope we are not missing something
> serious.
> At least we know that block setup data won't go to snapshot.
> I've also checked starting background snapshot from the stopped VM state -
> looks OK, VM resumes operation, snapshot is saved, no apparent problems.
>
> Maybe it will take some time, since now I'm on task to create tool to store
> snapshots with RAM indexable by GPFNs, together with the rest of VMSTATE.
If you want to make it indexable, why not just do a simple write(2) call
for the whole of RAM rather than doing the thing like normal migration?
Dave
> Based on QCOW2 format. Also it should support snapshot revert in postcopy
> mode.
>
> Andrey
>
> > > //
> > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Gruzdev <andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > migration/migration.c | 255
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > migration/migration.h | 3 +
> > > > > migration/ram.c | 2 +
> > > > > migration/savevm.c | 1 -
> > > > > migration/savevm.h | 2 +
> > > > > 5 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> > > > > index 2c2cb9ef01..0901a15ac5 100644
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > > - qemu_thread_create(&s->thread, "live_migration",
> > > > > migration_thread, s,
> > > > > - QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (migrate_background_snapshot()) {
> > > > > + qemu_thread_create(&s->thread, "background_snapshot",
> > > > Unfortunately that wont work - there's a 14 character limit on
> > > > the thread name length; I guess we just shorten that to bg_snapshot
> > > Yep, missed that pthread_set_name_np() has a length limit)
> > >
> > > > Other than that,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > > + bg_migration_thread, s, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + qemu_thread_create(&s->thread, "live_migration",
> > > > > + migration_thread, s, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > s->migration_thread_running = true;
> > > > > }
> > > > > diff --git a/migration/migration.h b/migration/migration.h
> > > > > index f40338cfbf..0723955cd7 100644
> > > > > --- a/migration/migration.h
> > > > > +++ b/migration/migration.h
> > > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > > > > #include "qemu/thread.h"
> > > > > #include "qemu/coroutine_int.h"
> > > > > #include "io/channel.h"
> > > > > +#include "io/channel-buffer.h"
> > > > > #include "net/announce.h"
> > > > > #include "qom/object.h"
> > > > > @@ -147,8 +148,10 @@ struct MigrationState {
> > > > > /*< public >*/
> > > > > QemuThread thread;
> > > > > + QEMUBH *vm_start_bh;
> > > > > QEMUBH *cleanup_bh;
> > > > > QEMUFile *to_dst_file;
> > > > > + QIOChannelBuffer *bioc;
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Protects to_dst_file pointer. We need to make sure we won't
> > > > > * yield or hang during the critical section, since this lock
> > > > > will
> > > > > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > > > > index 5707382db1..05fe0c8592 100644
> > > > > --- a/migration/ram.c
> > > > > +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > > > > @@ -1471,6 +1471,7 @@ static RAMBlock *poll_fault_page(RAMState *rs,
> > > > > ram_addr_t *offset)
> > > > > page_address = (void *) uffd_msg.arg.pagefault.address;
> > > > > bs = qemu_ram_block_from_host(page_address, false, offset);
> > > > > assert(bs && (bs->flags & RAM_UF_WRITEPROTECT) != 0);
> > > > > +
> > > > > return bs;
> > > > > }
> > > > > #endif /* CONFIG_LINUX */
> > > > > @@ -1836,6 +1837,7 @@ static void ram_save_host_page_post(RAMState
> > > > > *rs, PageSearchStatus *pss,
> > > > > /* Un-protect memory range. */
> > > > > res = uffd_change_protection(rs->uffdio_fd, page_address,
> > > > > run_length,
> > > > > false, false);
> > > > > +
> > > > > /* We don't want to override existing error from
> > > > > ram_save_host_page(). */
> > > > > if (res < 0 && *res_override >= 0) {
> > > > > *res_override = res;
> > > > > diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> > > > > index 27e842812e..dd4ad0aaaf 100644
> > > > > --- a/migration/savevm.c
> > > > > +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> > > > > @@ -1354,7 +1354,6 @@ int
> > > > > qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy_iterable(QEMUFile *f, bool
> > > > > in_postcopy)
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > > -static
> > > > > int qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy_non_iterable(QEMUFile *f,
> > > > > bool
> > > > > in_postcopy,
> > > > > bool
> > > > > inactivate_disks)
> > > > > diff --git a/migration/savevm.h b/migration/savevm.h
> > > > > index ba64a7e271..aaee2528ed 100644
> > > > > --- a/migration/savevm.h
> > > > > +++ b/migration/savevm.h
> > > > > @@ -64,5 +64,7 @@ int qemu_loadvm_state(QEMUFile *f);
> > > > > void qemu_loadvm_state_cleanup(void);
> > > > > int qemu_loadvm_state_main(QEMUFile *f, MigrationIncomingState
> > > > > *mis);
> > > > > int qemu_load_device_state(QEMUFile *f);
> > > > > +int qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy_non_iterable(QEMUFile *f,
> > > > > + bool in_postcopy, bool inactivate_disks);
> > > > > #endif
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > >
> > > --
> > > Andrey Gruzdev, Principal Engineer
> > > Virtuozzo GmbH +7-903-247-6397
> > > virtuzzo.com
> > >
> --
> Andrey Gruzdev, Principal Engineer
> Virtuozzo GmbH +7-903-247-6397
> virtuzzo.com
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
- [PATCH v11 3/5] migration: support UFFD write fault processing in ram_save_iterate(), (continued)
[PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/06
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2021/01/19
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2021/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2021/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/21
[PATCH v11 5/5] migration: introduce 'userfaultfd-wrlat.py' script, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/06
Re: [PATCH v11 0/5] UFFD write-tracking migration/snapshots, Andrey Gruzdev, 2021/01/15