[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Don't migrate CPUARMState.features
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Don't migrate CPUARMState.features |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:11:33 +0000 |
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 16:14, Aaron Lindsay <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> As feature flags are added or removed, the meanings of bits in the
> `features` field can change between QEMU versions, causing migration
> failures. Additionally, migrating the field is not useful because it is
> a constant function of the CPU being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/arm/machine.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.
-- PMM
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, (continued)
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Peter Maydell, 2021/02/03
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Aaron Lindsay, 2021/02/03
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/02/03
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2021/02/03
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Peter Maydell, 2021/02/03
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Aaron Lindsay, 2021/02/03
- [PATCH] target/arm: Don't migrate CPUARMState.features, Aaron Lindsay, 2021/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Don't migrate CPUARMState.features, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Don't migrate CPUARMState.features, Andrew Jones, 2021/02/03
- Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Don't migrate CPUARMState.features,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: ARM Snapshots Not Backwards-Compatible, Aaron Lindsay, 2021/02/03