[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] travis-ci: Disable C++ on Aarch64 container
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] travis-ci: Disable C++ on Aarch64 container |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:41:26 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) |
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:16:19AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 2/8/21 6:54 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 06/02/2021 21.05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Travis-CI seems to have enforced memory limit on containers,
> >> and the 'GCC check-tcg' job started to fail [*]:
> >>
> >> [2041/3679] Compiling C++ object libcommon.fa.p/disas_nanomips.cpp.o
> >> FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/disas_nanomips.cpp.o
> >> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> >> {standard input}:577781: Warning: end of file not at end of a line;
> >> newline inserted
> >> {standard input}:577882: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.lvl35769'
> >> {standard input}: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing
> >> .cfi_endproc directive
> >> c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
> >> compilation terminated.
> >
> > If disabling C++ "fixes" the issue, ok ...
> > Otherwise, we should maybe rather limit the amount of parallel jobs
> > there instead? (i.e. compiling with "make -j1" in the worst case?)
>
> I exhausted my Travis-CI credits (frankly I don't plan to pay for it
> with my own money). If the project expects developers to use Travis-CI,
> we should think at some way to buy credits and give them to developers
> on demand? [Cc'ing Stefan]
We should just stop wasting our time here. Simply delete the travis
config right now and worry about adding more coverage to gitlab
separately.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|