|
From: | Tom Lendacky |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Qemu SEV-ES guest support |
Date: | Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:35:45 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 2/8/21 10:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/02/21 16:48, Tom Lendacky wrote:Queued, thanks.It looks like David Gibson's patches for the memory encryption rework went into the main tree before mine. So, I think I'm going to have to rework my patches. Let me look into it.I was going to ask you to check out my own rebase, but it hadn't finished CI yet. Please take a look at branch sev-next at https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.com%2Fbonzini%2Fqemu&data=04%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C0fd806ab779a47c04fb508d8cc4eef45%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637483986711396809%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=kxzVD%2FwGNrU0zIhZjxyA0XCDtyycPW%2FROsvs3BrlkJE%3D&reserved=0 (commit 15acccb1b769aa3854bfd875d3d17945703e3f2a, ignore the PPC failure).
Everything looked good from a review perspective and AP booting worked without a hitch, which was the main area effected.
Thanks for taking care of it! Tom
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |