[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/24] hw/arm: New board model mps3-an524

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] hw/arm: New board model mps3-an524
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:38:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0

On 2/5/21 8:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 19:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:21 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 18:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>>>> On 2/5/21 5:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>> (The selftest is part of the AN524
>>>>> download so it's behind a EULA click-through and we can't put it
>>>>> into an acceptance test. We might be able to get something
>>>>> based on Zephyr or Arm TFM.)
>>>> Wondering about that... If anyone can go/click/accepts the EULA and
>>>> download artifacts, then I'd like these tests to be committed to the
>>>> repository, with a comment containing the download link, and the test
>>>> can use the skipUntil(BLOB_PATH && BLOB_HASH) syntax to assert the
>>>> binary I downloaded is the same you used for your test.
>>> I would rather not get into that. The selftest doesn't actually
>>> exercise as much of the emulation as you might think anyway.
>> This was clear from the previous paragraph, I was asking about the 
>> possibility
>> to have developers/maintainers individually accept EULA to download artifacts
>> for integration testing.
> Yes, and that is the thing I would rather we didn't get into.
> We should just have suitably redistributable acceptance tests
> where we can.

OK, understood.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]