qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh


From: frank . chang
Subject: [PATCH] target/riscv: fix TB_FLAGS bits overlapping bug for rvv/rvh
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:59:00 +0800

From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

TB_FLAGS mem_idx bits was extended from 2 bits to 3 bits in
commit: c445593, but other TB_FLAGS bits for rvv and rvh were
not shift as well so these bits may overlap with each other when
rvv is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.h | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 02758ae0eb4..1b49eb9950b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -379,12 +379,13 @@ typedef CPURISCVState CPUArchState;
 typedef RISCVCPU ArchCPU;
 #include "exec/cpu-all.h"
 
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 2, 1)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 3, 2)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 5, 3)
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 8, 1)
+/* Skip mem_idx bits */
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VL_EQ_VLMAX, 3, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, LMUL, 4, 2)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, SEW, 6, 3)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, VILL, 9, 1)
 /* Is a Hypervisor instruction load/store allowed? */
-FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 9, 1)
+FIELD(TB_FLAGS, HLSX, 10, 1)
 
 bool riscv_cpu_is_32bit(CPURISCVState *env);
 
-- 
2.17.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]