[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c] |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:51:50 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 2/23/21 10:18 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> I am all for "just getting it done", but here the i386 and the arm series
> become a mixture of things that I am not comfortable with,
> I'd prefer a dedicated series..
You're thinking too deeply about the problem that I'm reporting to you about
this patch set.
I just want the file naming done correctly, while you're renaming. That is
something you are actively changing in this patch set, so we should get it
right.
You don't have to worry about ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU vs ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
within the code itself.
r~
- Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c, Claudio Fontana, 2021/02/23
- Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/02/23
- Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c, Claudio Fontana, 2021/02/23
- softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c], Claudio Fontana, 2021/02/23
- Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c],
Richard Henderson <=
- Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c], Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/02/23
- Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c], Richard Henderson, 2021/02/23
- Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c], Paolo Bonzini, 2021/02/24
- Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c], Claudio Fontana, 2021/02/24
- Re: softmmu vs sysemu [Was: Re: [RFC v1 06/38] target/arm: split off cpu-softmmu.c], Paolo Bonzini, 2021/02/24