[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] virtiofsd: Enable posix_acl by default
From: |
Vivek Goyal |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] virtiofsd: Enable posix_acl by default |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:58:51 -0500 |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 05:52:48PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is V3 of the patches. Changes since v2 are.
>
> - I dropped the patch to give user an option to enable/disable acls.
> Now acls are enabled by default if xattrs are enabled and fuse
> client offers FUSE_POSIX_ACL capability.
>
> Miklos mentioned that ACLS might not have lot of overhead as these
> can be cached. So it might make sense to enable these by default.
Maybe ACL caching will only work well with cache=auto and cache=always.
With cache=none it probably will show most extra overhead.
For example, with cache=none, I did "su test". And then did "cat foo.txt"
and every time it results in two GETXATTR(system.posix_acl_access) calls.
2021-02-24 09:56:09.45-0500] [ID: 00000004] lo_getxattr(ino=1,
name=system.posix_acl_access size=4096)
[2021-02-24 09:56:09.45-0500] [ID: 00000004] lo_getxattr(ino=2,
name=system.posix_acl_access size=4096)
So this will definitely impact the performance with cache=none negatively.
I am now inclined to respin the patches and add options to enable/disable
acl and keep acl disabled by default. Those who need it, can enable it.
Vivek
>
> If we run into performance issues, then we can add another patch to
> give option to enable/disable and disable it by default.
>
> Luis Henriques reported that fstest generic/099 fails with virtiofs.
> Little debugging showed that we don't enable acl support. This
> patch series should fix the issue
>
> Vivek Goyal (2):
> virtiofsd: Add umask to seccom allow list
> virtiofsd: Enable posix_acls by default if xattrs are enabled
>
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.4
>