qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug 1879955] Re: target/i386/seg_helper.c: 16-bit TSS struct format wro


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: [Bug 1879955] Re: target/i386/seg_helper.c: 16-bit TSS struct format wrong?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:33:35 -0000

This is an automated cleanup. This bug report has been moved to QEMU's
new bug tracker on gitlab.com and thus gets marked as 'expired' now.
Please continue with the discussion here:

 https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/382


** Changed in: qemu
       Status: Incomplete => Expired

** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues #382
   https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/382

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879955

Title:
  target/i386/seg_helper.c: 16-bit TSS struct format wrong?

Status in QEMU:
  Expired

Bug description:
  In target/i386/seg_helper.c:switch_tss_ra() we have the following code
  to load registers from a 16-bit TSS struct:

          /* 16 bit */
          new_cr3 = 0;
          new_eip = cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(env, tss_base + 0x0e, retaddr);
          new_eflags = cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(env, tss_base + 0x10, retaddr);
          for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
              new_regs[i] = cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(env, tss_base + (0x12 + i * 2),
                                               retaddr) | 0xffff0000;
          }
          for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
              new_segs[i] = cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(env, tss_base + (0x22 + i * 4),
                                               retaddr);
          }
          new_ldt = cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(env, tss_base + 0x2a, retaddr);

  This doesn't match up with the structure described here:
  https://www.sandpile.org/x86/tss.htm -- which has only 2-byte slots
  for the segment registers. It also makes the 3rd segreg use the same
  offset as the LDTR, which is very suspicious. I suspect that this
  should use "(0x22 + i * 2)".

  The code later in the same function that stores the segment registers
  to the struct has the same bug.

  Found by code inspection; I don't have a test case to check this. As a
  non-x86-expert I'm just going to file a bug report in case somebody
  else feels like confirming the issue and sending a patch.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879955/+subscriptions



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]