[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 5/6] kvm/i386: Add support for user space MSR filtering
From: |
Siddharth Chandrasekaran |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 5/6] kvm/i386: Add support for user space MSR filtering |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:53:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 10:48:53AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 24.05.21 22:01, Siddharth Chandrasekaran wrote:
> > Check and enable user space MSR filtering capability and handle new exit
> > reason KVM_EXIT_X86_WRMSR. This will be used in a follow up patch to
> > implement hyper-v overlay pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@amazon.de>
>
> This patch will break bisection, because we're no longer handling the writes
> in kernel space after this, but we also don't have user space handling
> available yet, right? It might be better to move all logic in this patch
> that sets up the filter for Hyper-V MSRs into the next one.
Yes, that's correct. I'll just bounce back all reads/writes to KVM. That
should maintain the existing behaviour.
> > ---
> > target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> > index 362f04ab3f..3591f8cecc 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ static bool has_msr_ucode_rev;
> > static bool has_msr_vmx_procbased_ctls2;
> > static bool has_msr_perf_capabs;
> > static bool has_msr_pkrs;
> > +static bool has_msr_filtering;
> > +static bool msr_filters_active;
> > static uint32_t has_architectural_pmu_version;
> > static uint32_t num_architectural_pmu_gp_counters;
> > @@ -2138,6 +2140,57 @@ static void register_smram_listener(Notifier *n,
> > void *unused)
> > &smram_address_space, 1);
> > }
> > +static void kvm_set_msr_filter_range(struct kvm_msr_filter_range *range,
> > uint32_t flags,
> > + uint32_t base, uint32_t nmsrs, ...)
> > +{
> > + int i, filter_to_userspace;
> > + va_list ap;
> > +
> > + range->flags = flags;
> > + range->nmsrs = nmsrs;
> > + range->base = base;
> > +
> > + va_start(ap, nmsrs);
> > + for (i = 0; i < nmsrs; i++) {
> > + filter_to_userspace = va_arg(ap, int);
> > + if (!filter_to_userspace) {
> > + range->bitmap[i / 8] = 1 << (i % 8);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + va_end(ap);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int kvm_set_msr_filters(KVMState *s)
> > +{
> > + int r, nmsrs, nfilt = 0, bitmap_pos = 0;
> > + struct kvm_msr_filter filter = { };
> > + struct kvm_msr_filter_range *range;
> > + uint8_t bitmap_buf[KVM_MSR_FILTER_MAX_RANGES * 8] = {0};
> > +
> > + filter.flags = KVM_MSR_FILTER_DEFAULT_ALLOW;
> > +
> > + if (has_hyperv) {
> > + /* Hyper-V overlay page MSRs */
>
> I think you want to extend this comment and indicate in a human readable
> form that you set the filter on WRMSR to trap HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID and
> HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL into user space here.
Sure.
> > + nmsrs = 2;
> > + range = &filter.ranges[nfilt++];
> > + range->bitmap = &bitmap_buf[bitmap_pos];
> > + kvm_set_msr_filter_range(range, KVM_MSR_FILTER_WRITE,
> > + HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, nmsrs,
> > + true, /* HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID */
> > + true /* HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL */);
> > + bitmap_pos += ROUND_UP(nmsrs, 8) / 8;
> > + assert(bitmap_pos < sizeof(bitmap_buf));
> > + }
> > +
> > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_X86_SET_MSR_FILTER, &filter);
> > + if (r != 0) {
> > + error_report("kvm: failed to set MSR filters");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
> > {
> > uint64_t identity_base = 0xfffbc000;
> > @@ -2269,6 +2322,17 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
> > }
> > }
> > + has_msr_filtering = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR)
> > &&
> > + kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_MSR_FILTER);
> > + if (has_msr_filtering) {
> > + ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR, 0,
> > + KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_FILTER);
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + ret = kvm_set_msr_filters(s);
> > + msr_filters_active = (ret == 0);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -4542,6 +4606,11 @@ static bool host_supports_vmx(void)
> > return ecx & CPUID_EXT_VMX;
> > }
> > +static int kvm_handle_wrmsr(X86CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
>
> The default handler should always set run->msr.error = 1 to mimic the
> existing behavior.
Will do, thanks.
> > +}
> > +
> > #define VMX_INVALID_GUEST_STATE 0x80000021
> > int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
> > @@ -4600,6 +4669,9 @@ int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run
> > *run)
> > ioapic_eoi_broadcast(run->eoi.vector);
> > ret = 0;
> > break;
> > + case KVM_EXIT_X86_WRMSR:
> > + ret = kvm_handle_wrmsr(cpu, run);
>
> Please provide a default RDMSR handler as well here.
Ack.
~ Sid.
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879