Re: [RFC] GitLab issue tracker labeling process: arch/target, os, and accel labels

[Stefan Weil]

Am 14.06.21 um 19:32 schrieb John Snow:

> RTH raises the issue of the "TCI" subsystem of TCG, which is not a 
> full accelerator in its own right, but (I think) a special case of 
> TCG. If I keep the 1:1 mapping to ACCEL_CLASS_NAME, "accel: TCI" is 
> inappropriate.
>
> Some suggestions:
> - "TCI" by itself, simple enough.
> - "TCG-TCI" or "TCG: TCI" or "TCG/TCI" or similar, so that it shows up 
> in label search when you search for 'tcg'.
> - "accel: TCG:TCI". Similar to above but uses the "accel:" prefix too.
>
> My only concern here is completeness of the label: this one seems like 
> it's at particular risk of being forgotten or lost. It works perfectly 
> well as an organizational bucket for people working on TCI, but I 
> wonder if it will work well as an "issue inbox". Intended use begins 
> to matter here. Your thoughts, Stefan?


I appreciate your, Richard's and all other efforts to further improve 
the label system.

Regarding the label for TCI I have no special personal preferences. The 
above suggestions are all fine for me, so choose one which fits best to 
other labels.

Thanks,

Stefan