|
From: | Alexandre IOOSS |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] stm32vldiscovery: Add the STM32VLDISCOVERY Machine |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:16:30 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 |
On 6/14/21 5:52 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 17:10, Alexandre Iooss <erdnaxe@crans.org> wrote:This is a Cortex-M3 based machine. Information can be found at: https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/stm32vldiscovery.html Signed-off-by: Alexandre Iooss <erdnaxe@crans.org>The commit message says this is Cortex-M3 based, but the code gives it a Cortex-M4. Which is correct?
This is an typo. The board is Cortex-M3 so I will fix the machine code in next version of this patchset.
--- MAINTAINERS | 6 +++ default-configs/devices/arm-softmmu.mak | 1 + hw/arm/Kconfig | 4 ++ hw/arm/meson.build | 1 + hw/arm/stm32vldiscovery.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 hw/arm/stm32vldiscovery.cCould you add some documentation for the new board, please? This lives in docs/system/arm. Commit c9f8511ea8d2b807 gives an example of adding docs for a board. thanks -- PMM
Should I rather:1. Add `docs/system/arm/stm32vldiscovery.rst` to document only this new machine? 2. Add `docs/system/arm/stm32discovery.rst` to document this new machine and future STM32 Discovery boards?
3. Add `docs/system/arm/stm32.rst` to document all STM32-based boards?STM32 boards share a lot in common so I believe option 3 is more appropriate, what is your opinion? If we go with option 3, I can also try to document the Netduino Plus 2 (maybe in another commit, or another patchset later).
Thanks, -- Alexandre
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |