[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] s390x/css: Add passthrough IRB
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] s390x/css: Add passthrough IRB |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:59:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) |
On Wed, Jun 16 2021, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Wire in the subchannel callback for building the IRB
> ESW and ECW space for passthrough devices, and copy
> the hardware's ESW into the IRB we are building.
>
> If the hardware presented concurrent sense, then copy
> that sense data into the IRB's ECW space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/css.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c | 1 +
> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++++
> include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
(...)
> +void build_irb_passthrough(SubchDev *sch, IRB *irb)
> +{
> + /* Copy ESW from hardware */
> + irb->esw = sch->esw;
> +
> + if (irb->esw.erw & ESW_ERW_SENSE) {
> + /* Copy ECW from hardware */
> + build_irb_sense_data(sch, irb);
> + }
I'm wondering whether we should also copy "Model-dependent information"
(scsw 5 + 14 set, erw 7 unset). Seems more correct, and IIUC the guest
was tripped by the presence of erw 7 without valid sense data.
> +}
> +
[PATCH v3 3/4] s390x/css: Refactor IRB construction, Eric Farman, 2021/06/15