[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user/s390x: Fix psw.mask handling in signals
|
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user/s390x: Fix psw.mask handling in signals |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:38:40 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) |
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
>> in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
>
> Still seeing issues running on s390x machine:
(...)
> However running on x86 backend everything seems to be fine.
(...)
So, in summary, this improves things, although there are some remaining
problems?
Asking because I'm looking to queue this.
- [PATCH 4/5] target/s390x: Use s390_cpu_{set_psw, get_psw_mask} in gdbstub, (continued)
- [PATCH 4/5] target/s390x: Use s390_cpu_{set_psw, get_psw_mask} in gdbstub, Richard Henderson, 2021/06/14
- [PATCH 3/5] target/s390x: Improve s390_cpu_dump_state vs cc_op, Richard Henderson, 2021/06/14
- [PATCH 5/5] linux-user/s390x: Save and restore psw.mask properly, Richard Henderson, 2021/06/14
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user/s390x: Fix psw.mask handling in signals, Christian Borntraeger, 2021/06/15
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user/s390x: Fix psw.mask handling in signals, Alex Bennée, 2021/06/15
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user/s390x: Fix psw.mask handling in signals, jonathan.albrecht, 2021/06/15
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-user/s390x: Fix psw.mask handling in signals, Cornelia Huck, 2021/06/17