|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] target/riscv: Reduce riscv_tr_breakpoint_check pc advance to 2 |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:02:37 -1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
On 7/17/21 1:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
(What goes wrong if we just say "always use a TB size of 1 regardless of target arch" rather than having the arch return the worst case minimum insn length?)
Hmm, possibly nothing. Perhaps I should try that and see what happens... r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |