[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH resend v2 1/5] tpm: mark correct memory region range dirty when c

From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: [PATCH resend v2 1/5] tpm: mark correct memory region range dirty when clearing RAM
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:03:00 +0200

We might not start at the beginning of the memory region. We could also
calculate via the difference in the host address; however,
memory_region_set_dirty() also relies on memory_region_get_ram_addr()
internally, so let's just use that.

Acked-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: ffab1be70692 ("tpm: clear RAM when "memory overwrite" requested")
Cc: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
 hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
index 362edcc5c9..261f33431c 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
@@ -30,11 +30,13 @@ void tpm_ppi_reset(TPMPPI *tpmppi)
         QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &guest_phys_blocks.head, next) {
+            ram_addr_t mr_start = memory_region_get_ram_addr(block->mr);
                                  block->target_end - block->target_start);
             memset(block->host_addr, 0,
                    block->target_end - block->target_start);
-            memory_region_set_dirty(block->mr, 0,
+            memory_region_set_dirty(block->mr, block->target_start - mr_start,
                                     block->target_end - block->target_start);

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]