Let's make sure to not merge when different memory regions are involved.
Unlikely, but theoretically possible.
Cc: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
softmmu/memory_mapping.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/memory_mapping.c b/softmmu/memory_mapping.c
index d63f896b30..c149bad44a 100644
--- a/softmmu/memory_mapping.c
+++ b/softmmu/memory_mapping.c
@@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ static void guest_phys_blocks_region_add(MemoryListener
*listener,
/* we want continuity in both guest-physical and host-virtual memory */
if (predecessor->target_end < target_start ||
- predecessor->host_addr + predecessor_size != host_addr) {
+ predecessor->host_addr + predecessor_size != host_addr ||
+ predecessor->mr != section->mr) {
predecessor = NULL;
}
}