qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL for 6.1-rc1 00/28] doc, metadata, plugin and testing updates


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PULL for 6.1-rc1 00/28] doc, metadata, plugin and testing updates
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:04:03 +0100

On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/23/21 7:03 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > I realised I'm on holiday next week so I thought I'd better send this now.
> >
> > The following changes since commit a146af86c8247f41b641783428b95ee71eb0e43f:
> >
> >   Merge remote-tracking branch 
> > 'remotes/kraxel/tags/vga-20210723-pull-request' into staging (2021-07-23 
> > 12:16:12 +0100)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   https://github.com/stsquad/qemu.git tags/pull-for-6.1-rc1-230721-1
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 0a9487d80af9ed6fa14d2696bc34a920b32e53e5:
> >
> >   gitlab-ci: Extract OpenSBI job rules to reusable section (2021-07-23 
> > 17:22:16 +0100)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Doc, metadata, plugin and testing updates for 6.1-rc1:
> >
> >   - git ignore some file editor detritus
> >   - add overview on device emulation terminology
> >   - remove needless if leg in configure custom devices logic
> >   - numerous gitdm/mailmap updates
> >   - fix plugin_exit race for linux-user
> >   - fix a few bugs in cache modelling plugin
> >   - fix plugin calculation of physical address
> >   - handle pure assembler/linker tcg tests outside of docker
> >   - add tricore build to gitlab
> >   - remove superfluous MacOSX task
> >   - generalise the OpenBSI gitlab rules
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
> >       gitlab-ci: Extract OpenSBI job rules to reusable section
>
> Oops this isn't to latest version of this patch :/
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-07/msg06130.html

Given Alex is on holiday, should I apply this pullreq anyway and
then you could send a patch to fix up the differences afterwards,
or should we drop the pullreq (and maybe this stuff doesn't
go in for rc1)?

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]