Re: [PATCH for-6.2 06/10] docs: qom: Remove unnecessary class typedefs from example

[Markus Armbruster]

Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:

> When there's no specific class struct used for a QOM type, we
> normally don't define a typedef for it.  Remove the typedef from
> the minimal example, as it is unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/devel/qom.rst | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/devel/qom.rst b/docs/devel/qom.rst
> index 05d045bf570..dee60a64c0a 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/qom.rst
> +++ b/docs/devel/qom.rst
> @@ -20,9 +20,6 @@ features:
>  
>     #define TYPE_MY_DEVICE "my-device"
>  
> -   // No new virtual functions: we can reuse the typedef for the
> -   // superclass.
> -   typedef DeviceClass MyDeviceClass;
>     typedef struct MyDevice
>     {
>         DeviceState parent;

Documenting existing practice makes sense, but I'm not sure the existing
practice to elide this typedef makes sense.