qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-6.2 07/53] target/arm: Fix MVE 48-bit SQRSHRL for small r


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.2 07/53] target/arm: Fix MVE 48-bit SQRSHRL for small right shifts
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:07:39 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

On 7/29/21 1:14 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
We got an edge case wrong in the 48-bit SQRSHRL implementation: if
the shift is to the right, although it always makes the result
smaller than the input value it might not be within the 48-bit range
the result is supposed to be if the input had some bits in [63..48]
set and the shift didn't bring all of those within the [47..0] range.

Handle this similarly to the way we already do for this case in
do_uqrshl48_d(): extend the calculated result from 48 bits,
and return that if not saturating or if it doesn't change the
result; otherwise fall through to return a saturated value.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
Not squashed into the previous patch because that one has already
been reviewed, so as this fixes a different edge case I thought
it clearer kept separate.
---

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

  target/arm/mve_helper.c | 11 +++++++++--
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/mve_helper.c b/target/arm/mve_helper.c
index 5730b48f35e..1a4b2ef8075 100644
--- a/target/arm/mve_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/mve_helper.c
@@ -1563,6 +1563,8 @@ uint64_t HELPER(mve_uqrshll)(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t 
n, uint32_t shift)
  static inline int64_t do_sqrshl48_d(int64_t src, int64_t shift,
                                      bool round, uint32_t *sat)
  {
+    int64_t val, extval;
+
      if (shift <= -48) {
          /* Rounding the sign bit always produces 0. */
          if (round) {
@@ -1572,9 +1574,14 @@ static inline int64_t do_sqrshl48_d(int64_t src, int64_t 
shift,
      } else if (shift < 0) {
          if (round) {
              src >>= -shift - 1;
-            return (src >> 1) + (src & 1);
+            val = (src >> 1) + (src & 1);
+        } else {
+            val = src >> -shift;
+        }
+        extval = sextract64(val, 0, 48);
+        if (!sat || val == extval) {
+            return extval;
          }
-        return src >> -shift;

I'll note two things:

(1) The val == extval check could be sunk to the end of the function and shared with the left shift,

(2) sat will never be unset, as #48 is encoded as sat=1 in the insn.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]