qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] target-arm: delete ARM_FEATURE_A64FX


From: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] target-arm: delete ARM_FEATURE_A64FX
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 00:32:01 +0000

> This is confusing because I can't see this feature flag in the mainline 
> branch. Have
> you inadvertently based this series from an internal branch?

I'm sorry for the confusion.

My lack of understanding of how to handle v2 patches has led me to create a v2 
patch series
based on patches that have not been merged into upstream.
I will repost this so that the implementation can be closed in one patch series.

Best regards.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 7:36 PM
> To: Ishii, Shuuichirou/石井 周一郎 <ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com>
> Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] target-arm: delete ARM_FEATURE_A64FX
> 
> 
> Shuuichirou Ishii <ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> writes:
> 
> > The ARM_FEATURE_A64FX property was added, but there is no function
> > that uses this property yet, so it will be removed until a function
> > that uses it is added.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shuuichirou Ishii <ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  target/arm/cpu.h   | 1 -
> >  target/arm/cpu64.c | 1 -
> >  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index
> > 1b0c7b91ec..9f0a5f84d5 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -2145,7 +2145,6 @@ enum arm_features {
> >      ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY, /* M profile Security Extension */
> >      ARM_FEATURE_M_MAIN, /* M profile Main Extension */
> >      ARM_FEATURE_V8_1M, /* M profile extras only in v8.1M and later */
> > -    ARM_FEATURE_A64FX, /* Fujitsu A64FX processor HPC extensions
> > support */
> 
> This is confusing because I can't see this feature flag in the mainline 
> branch. Have
> you inadvertently based this series from an internal branch?
> 
> >  };
> >
> >  static inline int arm_feature(CPUARMState *env, int feature) diff
> > --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c index
> > a15f9c0c55..dd72300e88 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> > @@ -856,7 +856,6 @@ static void aarch64_a64fx_initfn(Object *obj)
> >      ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> >
> >      cpu->dtb_compatible = "arm,a64fx";
> > -    set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_A64FX);
> >      set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V8);
> >      set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_NEON);
> >      set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER);
> 
> 
> --
> Alex Bennée

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]