qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] fuzz: avoid building twice, when running on gitlab


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuzz: avoid building twice, when running on gitlab
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:01:45 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

+Coiby Xu & qemu-block@

On 8/9/21 9:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 20:30, Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On 210809 1506, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
>>> On 210809 1925, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 12:18, Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On oss-fuzz, we build twice, to put together a build that is portable to
>>>>> the runner containers. On gitlab ci, this is wasteful and contributes to
>>>>> timeouts on the build-oss-fuzz job. Avoid building twice on gitlab, at
>>>>> the remote cost of potentially missing some cases that break oss-fuzz
>>>>> builds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> From a couple test runs it looks like this can shave off 15-20 minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>>  scripts/oss-fuzz/build.sh | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>>>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> I tried a test run with this, but it still hit the 1 hour timeout:
>>>>
>>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/350387482
>>>
>>> It also timed out for me with a 120 minute timeout:
>>> https://gitlab.com/a1xndr/qemu/-/jobs/1488160601
>>>
>>> The log has almost exactly the same number of lines as yours, so I'm
>>> guessing one of the qtests is timing out with --enable-sanitizers .
> 
>>
>> Building locally:
>> $ CC=clang-11 CXX=clang++-11 ../configure --enable-fuzzing \
>>     --enable-debug --enable-sanitizers
>> $ make check-qtest-i386 check-unit
>>
>> Same as on gitlab, this times out shortly after outputting
>> "sh: 1: exec: ./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon: not found"
>>
>> Manually running qos-test, the same way check-qtest-i386 invokes it:
>>
>> $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-i386 
>> QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon 
>> tests/qtest/qos-test --tap -k -m quick < /dev/null
>>
>> # starting vhost-user backend: exec ./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon 
>> --blockdev driver=file,node-name=disk0,filename=qtest.XRAzzu --export 
>> type=vhost-user-blk,id=disk0,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/tmp/qtest-94561-sock.NdKWpt,node-name=disk0,writable=on,num-queues=1
>> sh: 1: exec: ./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon: not found
>> # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-i386 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-94561.sock 
>> -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-94561.qmp,id=char0 -mon 
>> chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M pc  -device 
>> vhost-user-blk-pci,id=drv0,chardev=char1,addr=4.0 -object 
>> memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M,share=on  -M memory-backend=mem -m 
>> 256M -chardev socket id=char1,path=/tmp/qtest-94561-sock.NdKWpt  -accel qtest
>>
>> *timeout*
> 
> vhost-user timing out in realize I suspect. I see that as
> an intermittent hang in non-sanitizer configs.
> 
> vhost-user folk: Can we either look at fixing this or else disable
> the test ? (Stack backtraces available in the other email thread.)
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]