[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ide: Cap LBA28 capacity announcement to 2^28-1
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ide: Cap LBA28 capacity announcement to 2^28-1 |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Sep 2021 09:30:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Ping?
Samuel Thibault, le mar. 24 août 2021 12:43:44 +0200, a ecrit:
> The LBA28 capacity (at offsets 60/61 of identification) is supposed to
> express the maximum size supported by LBA28 commands. If the device is
> larger than this, we have to cap it to 2^28-1.
>
> At least NetBSD happens to be using this value to determine whether to use
> LBA28 or LBA48 for its commands, using LBA28 for sectors that don't need
> LBA48. This commit thus fixes NetBSD access to disks larger than 128GiB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
> ---
> hw/ide/core.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
> index fd69ca3167..e28f8aad61 100644
> --- a/hw/ide/core.c
> +++ b/hw/ide/core.c
> @@ -98,8 +98,12 @@ static void put_le16(uint16_t *p, unsigned int v)
> static void ide_identify_size(IDEState *s)
> {
> uint16_t *p = (uint16_t *)s->identify_data;
> - put_le16(p + 60, s->nb_sectors);
> - put_le16(p + 61, s->nb_sectors >> 16);
> + int64_t nb_sectors_lba28 = s->nb_sectors;
> + if (nb_sectors_lba28 >= 1 << 28) {
> + nb_sectors_lba28 = (1 << 28) - 1;
> + }
> + put_le16(p + 60, nb_sectors_lba28);
> + put_le16(p + 61, nb_sectors_lba28 >> 16);
> put_le16(p + 100, s->nb_sectors);
> put_le16(p + 101, s->nb_sectors >> 16);
> put_le16(p + 102, s->nb_sectors >> 32);
> --
> 2.32.0
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH] ide: Cap LBA28 capacity announcement to 2^28-1,
Samuel Thibault <=