qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] hw/arm/aspeed: Initialize AST2600 UART clock selectio


From: Peter Delevoryas
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] hw/arm/aspeed: Initialize AST2600 UART clock selection registers
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:37:40 +0000


> On Sep 7, 2021, at 1:24 AM, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:40, <pdel@fb.com> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
>> 
>> UART5 is typically used as the default debug UART on the AST2600, but
>> UART1 is also designed to be a debug UART. All the AST2600 UART's have
>> semi-configurable clock rates through registers in the System Control
>> Unit (SCU), but only UART5 works out of the box with zero-initialized
>> values. The rest of the UART's expect a few of the registers to be
>> initialized to non-zero values, or else the clock rate calculation will
>> yield zero or undefined (due to a divide-by-zero).
>> 
>> For reference, the U-Boot clock rate driver here shows the calculation:
>> 
>>    
>> https://github.com/facebook/openbmc-uboot/blob/15f7e0dc01d8/drivers/clk/aspeed/clk_ast2600.c#L357
>> 
>> To summarize, UART5 allows selection from 4 rates: 24 MHz, 192 MHz, 24 /
>> 13 MHz, and 192 / 13 MHz. The other UART's allow selecting either the
>> "low" rate (UARTCLK) or the "high" rate (HUARTCLK). UARTCLK and HUARTCLK
>> are configurable themselves:
>> 
>>    UARTCLK = UXCLK * R / (N * 2)
>>    HUARTCLK = HUXCLK * HR / (HN * 2)
>> 
>> UXCLK and HUXCLK are also configurable, and depend on the APLL and/or
>> HPLL clock rates, which also derive from complicated calculations. Long
>> story short, there's lots of multiplication and division from
>> configurable registers, and most of these registers are zero-initialized
>> in QEMU, which at best is unexpected and at worst causes this clock rate
>> driver to hang from divide-by-zero's. This can also be difficult to
>> diagnose, because it may cause U-Boot to hang before serial console
>> initialization completes, requiring intervention from gdb.
>> 
>> This change just initializes all of these registers with default values
>> from the datasheet.
>> 
>> To test this, I used Facebook's AST2600 OpenBMC image for "fuji", with
>> the following diff applied (because fuji uses UART1 for console output,
>> not UART5).
>> 
>>  @@ -323,8 +323,8 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize(DeviceState 
>> *dev, Error **errp)
>>       }
>> 
>>      /* UART - attach an 8250 to the IO space as our UART5 */
>>  -    serial_mm_init(get_system_memory(), sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_UART5], 2,
>>  -                   aspeed_soc_get_irq(s, ASPEED_DEV_UART5),
>>  +    serial_mm_init(get_system_memory(), sc->memmap[ASPEED_DEV_UART1], 2,
>>  +                   aspeed_soc_get_irq(s, ASPEED_DEV_UART1),
>>                    38400, serial_hd(0), DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN);
>> 
>>       /* I2C */
>> 
>> Without these clock rate registers being initialized, U-Boot hangs in
>> the clock rate driver from a divide-by-zero, because the UART1 clock
>> rate register reads return zero, and there's no console output. After
>> initializing them with default values, fuji boots successfully.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>
>> ---
>> hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c b/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c
>> index 05edebedeb..a95dca65f2 100644
>> --- a/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c
>> +++ b/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c
>> @@ -119,6 +119,8 @@
>> #define AST2600_CLK_SEL3          TO_REG(0x308)
>> #define AST2600_CLK_SEL4          TO_REG(0x310)
>> #define AST2600_CLK_SEL5          TO_REG(0x314)
>> +#define AST2600_UARTCLK_PARAM     TO_REG(0x338)
>> +#define AST2600_HUARTCLK_PARAM    TO_REG(0x33C)
> 
> It would be consistent with the existing naming if we dropped the
> _PARAM. Not worth re-spinning just for that though.

Yeah sorry about that, I wasn’t sure what name to use here. The
datasheet names “Generate UARTCLK from UXCLK” and “Generate HUARTCLK
from HUXCLK” seemed too long and didn’t match anything else. I thought
these registers were kind of similar to the HPLL_PARAM register, just
for UARTCLK and HUARTCLK. If there are any further revisions I can
change it though.

> 
>> #define AST2600_HW_STRAP1         TO_REG(0x500)
>> #define AST2600_HW_STRAP1_CLR     TO_REG(0x504)
>> #define AST2600_HW_STRAP1_PROT    TO_REG(0x508)
>> @@ -681,6 +683,8 @@ static const uint32_t 
>> ast2600_a3_resets[ASPEED_AST2600_SCU_NR_REGS] = {
>>     [AST2600_CLK_SEL3]          = 0x00000000,
>>     [AST2600_CLK_SEL4]          = 0xF3F40000,
>>     [AST2600_CLK_SEL5]          = 0x30000000,
>> +    [AST2600_UARTCLK_PARAM]     = 0x00014506,
>> +    [AST2600_HUARTCLK_PARAM]    = 0x000145C0,
> 
> These match v9 of the datasheet, so they look good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>

Thanks!
Peter

> 
>>     [AST2600_CHIP_ID0]          = 0x1234ABCD,
>>     [AST2600_CHIP_ID1]          = 0x88884444,
>> };
>> --
>> 2.30.2


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]