qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 06:10:09 -0400

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 07:39:21AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices
> MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not
> been acknowledged by the driver."  This is exactly what QEMU as of 6.1
> has done relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting that.
> 
> However, the specification also says: "... the driver MAY read (but MUST
> NOT write) the device-specific configuration fields to check that it can
> support the device ..." before setting FEATURES_OK.
> 
> In that case, any transitional device relying solely on
> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting legacy drivers will return data in
> legacy format.  In particular, this implies that it is in big endian
> format for big endian guests. This naturally confuses the driver which
> expects little endian in the modern mode.
> 
> It is probably a good idea to amend the spec to clarify that
> VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 can only be relied on after the feature negotiation
> is complete. Before validate callback existed, config space was only
> read after FEATURES_OK. However, we already have two regressions, so
> let's address this here as well.
> 
> The regressions affect the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature of virtio-net and
> the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature of virtio-blk for BE guests when
> virtio 1.0 is used on both sides. The latter renders virtio-blk unusable
> with DASD backing, because things simply don't work with the default.
> See Fixes tags for relevant commits.
> 
> For QEMU, we can work around the issue by writing out the feature bits
> with VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 bit set.  We (ab)use the finalize_features
> config op for this. This isn't enough to address all vhost devices since
> these do not get the features until FEATURES_OK, however it looks like
> the affected devices actually never handled the endianness for legacy
> mode correctly, so at least that's not a regression.
> 
> No devices except virtio net and virtio blk seem to be affected.
> 
> Long term the right thing to do is to fix the hypervisors.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v4.11
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 82e89ea077b9 ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config 
> space")
> Fixes: fe36cbe0671e ("virtio_net: clear MTU when out of range")
> Reported-by: markver@us.ibm.com
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

OK this looks good! How about a QEMU patch to make it spec compliant on
BE?

> ---
> 
> @Connie: I made some more commit message changes to accommodate Michael's
> requests. I just assumed these will work or you as well and kept your
> r-b. Please shout at me if it needs to be dropped :)
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> index 0a5b54034d4b..236081afe9a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
>               driver_features_legacy = driver_features;
>       }
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Some devices detect legacy solely via F_VERSION_1. Write
> +      * F_VERSION_1 to force LE config space accesses before FEATURES_OK for
> +      * these when needed.
> +      */
> +     if (drv->validate && !virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()
> +                       && device_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> +             dev->features = BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
> +             dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
> +     }
> +
>       if (device_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
>               dev->features = driver_features & device_features;
>       else
> 
> base-commit: 60a9483534ed0d99090a2ee1d4bb0b8179195f51
> -- 
> 2.25.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]