[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] cpu-models-x86.rst: Tidy up a couple of things
From: |
Kashyap Chamarthy |
Subject: |
[PATCH] cpu-models-x86.rst: Tidy up a couple of things |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2021 17:22:59 +0200 |
- Remove stray texinfo syntax (remnants of texinfo to rST conversion)
- Clarify the bit about long-term stable CPU models
TODO: In a future patch, include potential examples as discussed
here[1].
[1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-10/msg03411.html
-- On versioned CPU models, aliases, and machine types
Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
---
Eduardo/DanPB: I'm not 100% sure if my wording got it right; please give
it a close reading to make sure I'm not making things worse.
---
docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc
b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc
index 6e8be7d79b..e133753920 100644
--- a/docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc
+++ b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Two ways to configure CPU models with QEMU / KVM
typically refer to specific generations of hardware released by
Intel and AMD. These allow the guest VMs to have a degree of
isolation from the host CPU, allowing greater flexibility in live
- migrating between hosts with differing hardware. @end table
+ migrating between hosts with differing hardware.
In both cases, it is possible to optionally add or remove individual CPU
features, to alter what is presented to the guest by default.
@@ -47,11 +47,20 @@ defined. Traditionally most operating systems and
toolchains would
only target the original baseline ABI. It is expected that in
future OS and toolchains are likely to target newer ABIs. The
table that follows illustrates which ABI compatibility levels
-can be satisfied by the QEMU CPU models. Note that the table only
-lists the long term stable CPU model versions (eg Haswell-v4).
-In addition to whats listed, there are also many CPU model
-aliases which resolve to a different CPU model version,
-depending on the machine type is in use.
+can be satisfied by the QEMU CPU models. Note that the table only lists
+the long term stable CPU model versions (e.g. Haswell-v4, Haswell-v3).
+CPU models without a version tag will alias to a CPU model with a
+version tag, and the alias varies depending on the machine type. In
+addition to what is listed, there are also many CPU model aliases which
+resolve to a different CPU model version, depending on the machine type
+in use.
+
+The versioned CPU models (e.g. ``Cascadelake-Server-v4``,
+``Broadwell-v4``) are long-term stable. Further, when using a versioned
+machine type (e.g. ``pc-q35-6.0``), instead of its generic alias
+(``q35``), the CPU models that are associated with it are also long-term
+stable. This is because the CPUID features in the CPU models that are
+part of a versioned machine type do not change.
.. _ABI compatibility levels: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/
@@ -185,8 +194,8 @@ features are included if using "Host passthrough" or "Host
model".
guest. Instead, the host kernel uses it to populate the MDS
vulnerability file in ``sysfs``.
- So it should only be enabled for VMs if the host reports @code{Not
- affected} in the ``/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds`` file.
+ So it should only be enabled for VMs if the host reports ``Not
+ affected`` in the ``/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds`` file.
``taa-no``
Recommended to inform that the guest that the host is ``not``
--
2.31.1
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [PATCH] cpu-models-x86.rst: Tidy up a couple of things,
Kashyap Chamarthy <=