qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] block/export/fuse.c: fix musl build


From: Fabrice Fontaine
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/export/fuse.c: fix musl build
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:08:50 +0200

Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 08:31, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> a écrit :
>
> 22.10.2021 12:52, Fabrice Fontaine пишет:
> > Include linux/falloc.h if CONFIG_FALLOCATE_ZERO_RANGE is defined to fix
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/50482fda98bd62e072c30b7ea73c985c4e9d9bbb
> > and avoid the following build failure on musl:
> >
> > ../block/export/fuse.c: In function 'fuse_fallocate':
> > ../block/export/fuse.c:643:21: error: 'FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE' undeclared 
> > (first use in this function)
> >    643 |     else if (mode & FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE) {
> >        |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Fixes:
> >   - 
> > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/be24433a429fda681fb66698160132c1c99bc53b
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   block/export/fuse.c | 4 ++++
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/export/fuse.c b/block/export/fuse.c
> > index 2e3bf8270b..823c126d23 100644
> > --- a/block/export/fuse.c
> > +++ b/block/export/fuse.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> >   #include <fuse.h>
> >   #include <fuse_lowlevel.h>
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_FALLOCATE_ZERO_RANGE)
>
> shouldn't it be "if !defined" ?
Nope, here is an extract of meson.build:

config_host_data.set('CONFIG_FALLOCATE_ZERO_RANGE',
                     cc.has_header_symbol('linux/falloc.h',
'FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE'))

So, CONFIG_FALLOCATE_ZERO_RANGE is defined if FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE is
found in linux/falloc.h which is fine.
However, because linux/falloc.h is not included in fuse.c, a build
failure will be raised on musl (which does not define
FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE)
>
> /mjt
>
> > +#include <linux/falloc.h>
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   #ifdef __linux__
> >   #include <linux/fs.h>
> >   #endif
> >
>
Best Regards,

Fabrice



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]