[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-balloon: correct used length
From: |
Jason Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-balloon: correct used length |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:48:25 +0800 |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:37 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:14 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:20:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > Spec said:
> > > >
> > > > "and len the total of bytes written into the buffer."
> > > >
> > > > For inflateq, deflateq and statsq, we don't process in_sg so the used
> > > > length should be zero. For free_page_vq, since the pages could be
> > > > changed in the destination, we should make all pages used for safety.
> > >
> > > Yea, about that, I know I said it, but I was wrong, sorry.
> > >
> > > Spec says this:
> > >
> > > \field{len} is particularly useful
> > > for drivers using untrusted buffers: if a driver does not know
> > > exactly
> > > how much has been written by the device, the driver would have to
> > > zero
> > > the buffer in advance to ensure no data leakage occurs.
> > >
> > > For example, a network driver may hand a received buffer directly
> > > to
> > > an unprivileged userspace application. If the network device has
> > > not
> > > overwritten the bytes which were in that buffer, this could leak
> > > the
> > > contents of freed memory from other processes to the application.
> > >
> > >
> > > In other words, device must guarantee that used length was
> > > written into. Since we don't know that, we really should
> > > write 0 there, and the fact we don't is a spec violation.
> >
> > The problem is, if we write 0, the driver may assume there's no change
> > on those pages?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> No:
>
>
> The driver MUST NOT make assumptions about data in device-writable buffers
> beyond the first \field{len} bytes, and SHOULD ignore this data.
Good to know this. Will fix it in V2.
Thanks
>
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c | 8 +++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> > > > index 17de2558cb..fb4426ac0c 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c
> > > > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void balloon_stats_poll_cb(void *opaque)
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - virtqueue_push(s->svq, s->stats_vq_elem, s->stats_vq_offset);
> > > > + virtqueue_push(s->svq, s->stats_vq_elem, 0);
> > > > virtio_notify(vdev, s->svq);
> > > > g_free(s->stats_vq_elem);
> > > > s->stats_vq_elem = NULL;
> > > > @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static void
> > > > virtio_balloon_handle_output(VirtIODevice *vdev, VirtQueue *vq)
> > > > memory_region_unref(section.mr);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - virtqueue_push(vq, elem, offset);
> > > > + virtqueue_push(vq, elem, 0);
> > > > virtio_notify(vdev, vq);
> > > > g_free(elem);
> > > > virtio_balloon_pbp_free(&pbp);
> > > > @@ -510,6 +510,7 @@ static bool get_free_page_hints(VirtIOBalloon *dev)
> > > > VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> > > > VirtQueue *vq = dev->free_page_vq;
> > > > bool ret = true;
> > > > + size_t used = 0;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > while (dev->block_iothread) {
> > > > @@ -548,11 +549,12 @@ static bool get_free_page_hints(VirtIOBalloon
> > > > *dev)
> > > > for (i = 0; i < elem->in_num; i++) {
> > > > qemu_guest_free_page_hint(elem->in_sg[i].iov_base,
> > > > elem->in_sg[i].iov_len);
> > > > + used += elem->in_sg[i].iov_len;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > out:
> > > > - virtqueue_push(vq, elem, 1);
> > > > + virtqueue_push(vq, elem, used);
> > > > g_free(elem);
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, David Hildenbrand, 2021/11/25
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2021/11/25
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, David Hildenbrand, 2021/11/25
- RE: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Wang, Wei W, 2021/11/25
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2021/11/25
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Jason Wang, 2021/11/25
- RE: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Wang, Wei W, 2021/11/25
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Jason Wang, 2021/11/25
Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito-balloon: process all in sgs for free_page_vq, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/11/25