qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] migration/dirtyrate: implement vCPU dirtyrate calcula


From: Hyman
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] migration/dirtyrate: implement vCPU dirtyrate calculation periodically
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 23:36:01 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2



在 2021/12/6 18:18, Peter Xu 写道:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 09:39:45AM +0800, huangy81@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
+static void dirtylimit_calc_func(void)
+{
+    CPUState *cpu;
+    DirtyPageRecord *dirty_pages;
+    int64_t start_time, end_time, calc_time;
+    DirtyRateVcpu rate;
+    int i = 0;
+
+    dirty_pages = g_malloc0(sizeof(*dirty_pages) *
+        dirtylimit_calc_state->data.nvcpu);
+
+    CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
+        record_dirtypages(dirty_pages, cpu, true);
+    }
+
+    start_time = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
+    g_usleep(DIRTYLIMIT_CALC_TIME_MS * 1000);
+    end_time = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
+    calc_time = end_time - start_time;
+
+    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+    memory_global_dirty_log_sync();
+    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+
+    CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
+        record_dirtypages(dirty_pages, cpu, false);
+    }
+
+    for (i = 0; i < dirtylimit_calc_state->data.nvcpu; i++) {
+        uint64_t increased_dirty_pages =
+            dirty_pages[i].end_pages - dirty_pages[i].start_pages;
+        uint64_t memory_size_MB =
+            (increased_dirty_pages * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) >> 20;
+        int64_t dirtyrate = (memory_size_MB * 1000) / calc_time;
+
+        rate.id = i;
+        rate.dirty_rate  = dirtyrate;
+        dirtylimit_calc_state->data.rates[i] = rate;
+
+        trace_dirtyrate_do_calculate_vcpu(i,
+            dirtylimit_calc_state->data.rates[i].dirty_rate);
+    }
+}

This looks so like the calc-dirty-rate code already.

I think adding a new resion (GLOBAL_DIRTY_LIMIT) is fine, however still, any
Ok.
chance to merge the code?
I'm not sure about merging but i'll try it. :)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]